ABA Fundamentals

Teaching abduction prevention skills to children using a one‐on‐one training setting

Berube et al. (2021) · Behavioral Interventions 2021
★ The Verdict

BST teaches most preschoolers to refuse lures, and a quick round of real-world rehearsal catches the rest.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running safety programs in clinics, preschools, or Head Start centers.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only serve verbal adults or severe behavior cases.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Three preschoolers without disabilities learned stranger-danger skills.

Trainers used Behavioral Skills Training: explain, model, practice, and praise.

They added in-situ training later if the child did not pass a real-life test.

02

What they found

Two kids reached mastery after BST alone.

The third child only passed after extra practice in the real world.

All three finally said “No,” walked away, and told an adult when a stranger tried to lure them.

03

How this fits with other research

Reis et al. (2022) looks like a clash. They taught girls with mild intellectual disability in a group. The girls learned the rules but still went with the stranger in a test.

The difference is the kids. Berube worked with typical preschoolers one-on-one. Reis worked with older girls who have ID in a group lecture. One-on-one BST beats group talk for kids who need more support.

Laske et al. (2024) and García-Villamisar et al. (2017) show the same BST steps work for other skills—public speaking and reading—so the method keeps winning across ages and goals.

04

Why it matters

Use BST first for safety lessons in preschool or clinic. Watch the post-test. If the child still goes with the stranger, roll straight into in-situ training: practice in the store, playground, or parking lot. Keep the cycle until the child passes three real-life probes. That small tweak closes the gap for the one kid who needs it.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a BST session on stranger danger, then test in the parking lot; if the child fails, stay outside and practice until they pass.

02At a glance

Intervention
behavioral skills training
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
3
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

AbstractChild abduction is an uncommon but extremely dangerous event. The current study examined teaching abduction prevention skills to typically developing triplet boys using behavior skills training (BST) with the combination of in situ training (IST). We used a concurrent multiple baseline across participants design to evaluate the effects of BST and IST on teaching abduction prevention skills. When encountering a (confederate) stranger, participants were assessed on occurrence of three behaviors: saying “no,” leaving the scene, and telling an adult what happened. After implementing BST, participants were again tested using a novel stranger probe; if the participant scored below a perfect score, then IST was implemented. Two participants did not need IST. One participant received IST and performed the safety skills to mastery following IST. Results demonstrated that BST in a one‐on‐one setting was effective at teaching abduction prevention skills for two participants and effective when combined with IST for one participant.

Behavioral Interventions, 2021 · doi:10.1002/bin.1806