Three-configuration matching-to-sample in the pigeon.
Limited training layouts can lock learners into position habits that break when the layout changes.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers taught pigeons a matching game. The birds saw one shape on a center key and had to peck the same shape on a side key.
Only three of four possible side-key positions were used during training. Later the team added the fourth, never-seen position.
They wanted to see if the birds would still match correctly when the new spot appeared.
What they found
The pigeons bombed. Most birds started pecking the same physical spot again and again, even when the shape there was wrong.
Strong position bias took over. Accuracy crashed when the new configuration showed up.
How this fits with other research
Robinson et al. (1974) saw the same crash with new colors and shapes. Together the studies warn: pigeons (and maybe kids) lock onto the exact way you first set the task.
Sprague et al. (1984) looks like a contradiction at first. Their birds matched brand-new figures just fine. The fix was tiny: they let the pigeons see the side keys a little earlier, breaking the position habit.
Nelson et al. (1978) and Cook (2002) show the broader rule. When training mixes in non-matching trials and keeps the correct key consistent, pigeons learn a flexible rule instead of a rigid position.
Why it matters
Your learner might act like these pigeons. If you always flash the correct picture on the right, the child may just point right. Rotate seats, shuffle cards left and right, and mix in easy wrong choices early. A few extra examples during teaching beats big trouble during testing.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Put the correct comparison card on the left for half the trials today.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Pigeons were trained on a zero-delay matching-to-sample procedure during which only three of the four possible stimulus configurations were presented. Subsequently, all birds were exposed to all four configurations as a transfer test. A high degree of negative transfer from the three training configurations was obtained in Experiment 1. The results of Experiment 2 indicated that three-configuration training produced differential position-preference effects. During the transfer test, responding after one sample stimulus was apparently based on position, while responding after the other sample was based on color.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1972 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.17-483