The premack principle, response deprivation, and establishing operations.
Treat a brief hold on any favorite activity as an EO—it will suddenly work as a reinforcer.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Hastings et al. (2001) wrote a theory paper. They asked, "What makes an activity work as a reinforcer?"
They said, "Stop calling it a reinforcer. Call it an establishing operation."
When you block a child from a favorite toy, that toy becomes more powerful. The block is the EO.
What they found
The authors found that response deprivation is the EO.
Limiting access to a high-probability activity makes it a reinforcer. It also makes the child try harder to get it.
How this fits with other research
Allison (1993) said the same thing first. He used the words "response-deprivation schedule." Hastings et al. (2001) just swapped in the newer EO label.
Nevin et al. (2005) tested the idea with kids with autism. They withheld snacks. The kids then asked peers for snacks. This shows the EO works in real therapy rooms.
Jones et al. (2010) did the same with attention. They gave lots of attention before a session. Problem behavior rose. Withholding attention worked like an EO. The lab and the clinic now match.
Why it matters
You already control reinforcers. Now you can control their power. Before a session, withhold the item for a short time. That brief hold turns the item into a stronger reinforcer. Use this trick to boost mand training, peer initiations, or any program that needs quick motivation.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Withhold the child’s top toy for five minutes, then use it to reinforce the first peer mand.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This paper describes response deprivation as an establishing operation. In this context, we review the concept of establishing operation, in particular, its reinforcer-establishing and evocative effects; we place response deprivation in the literature on the reinforcing effects of behavioral activity, wherein response deprivation subsumes the Premack principle; we describe the reinforcer-altering and evocative effects of response deprivation; and we address a methodological concern about the evocative effect. In closing, we discuss some conceptual and empirical implications of the foregoing analyses.
The Behavior analyst, 2001 · doi:10.1007/BF03392028