The maintenance of behavior by the termination and onset of intense noise.
Noise onset and offset can both reinforce behavior, showing that relief itself is a reinforcer.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with lab animals in a sound-proof box.
They made loud noise start or stop when the animal pressed a lever.
The question: can the noise change itself keep the lever pressing going?
What they found
Both ‘noise off’ and ‘noise on’ kept the lever pressing alive.
The result showed that an everyday aversive event can act as a reinforcer.
How this fits with other research
Weisman et al. (1975) repeated the idea with blackout instead of noise.
Their pigeons kept pecking a switch because it turned the lights off.
Allen et al. (1989) stretched the rule further.
They showed that even a stimulus that signals ‘no food’ can still reinforce an observing response.
Jones et al. (2007) seem to clash.
Their high-running mice would not work for a quick chance to run.
The difference: noise offset is a sudden relief, while 90 s of running is too short for those mice.
Same principle—relief matters—but the organism and the size of the reinforcer must match.
Why it matters
You now know that turning something off can be just as powerful as giving something good.
Look at what your client tries to escape—noise, bright lights, chatter.
Let brief ‘off’ periods follow the target response and you may see the behavior grow without any edible or toy reinforcer.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Identify one aversive classroom sound and let the learner press a button that gives 10 s of quiet each time the target skill occurs.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The purposes of the present investigation were, first, the establishment of the strength and temporal distribution of responses maintained by the termination and onset of a noise; and, secondly, the isolation of some of the variables which control such behavior.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1959 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1959.2-23