The effects of work-reinforcer schedules on performance and preference in students with autism.
Kids with autism work faster and like it more when you reinforce every response instead of saving rewards for later.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three students with autism did school work under two reward plans. One plan gave a reward after every task. The other plan gave the same reward after a chunk of tasks.
The team switched the plans back-to-back each day to see which one the kids finished faster and liked more.
What they found
When rewards came after every task, two kids finished their work sooner. All three kids picked the every-task plan when they could choose.
The kids also liked doing the work more when the reward was right there each time.
How this fits with other research
Kocher et al. (2015) ran the same setup and got the same win for every-task rewards. They also saw kids master new skills faster with that plan.
Llinas et al. (2022) tested giving toys non-stop versus on a timer. Again, the steady stream beat the stop-and-start schedule for kids with autism.
Giunta‐Fede et al. (2016) looked at data sheets instead of rewards. They still found that keeping the measure going every moment caught learning quicker than spot checks.
Why it matters
If you want shorter table-time and happier learners, give the reinforcer right after each response. Skip the big blocks of work before the next break. Try it next session: deliver one piece of candy, token, or praise for every single correct answer and watch the work fly by.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Start your next trial with a 1:1 response-to-reinforcer ratio and time how long the session takes.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
This study investigated performance under and preference for continuous and discontinuous work-reinforcer schedules in 3 students who had been diagnosed with autism. Under continuous schedules, participants completed all work and consumed all reinforcers in contiguous units. Under discontinuous schedules, work and reinforcer access were broken up into smaller units. During the alternating-schedules phase, session duration was shorter in the continuous schedule for 2 participants. During free choice, all 3 participants preferred the continuous work schedule.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2015 · doi:10.1002/jaba.188