The Effects of the Big 6 + 6 Skills Training on Daily Living Skills for an Adolescent With Intellectual Disability
Quick daily motor-timing drills can make untrained daily-living skills faster and neater for teens with ID.
01Research in Context
What this study did
One teen with intellectual disability practiced six hand and six foot movements every day. The team counted how fast the moves were done and how many were correct.
After two weeks of drills, they tested real-life tasks the teen had never practiced. They timed buttoning a shirt, tying shoes, and putting toothpaste on a brush.
What they found
The teen’s finger and foot speeds jumped by 30 to 50 percent. Errors in the drills dropped to almost zero.
On the new daily-living tasks, the teen finished 20 to 40 percent faster and made fewer mistakes. The gains stayed one month later.
How this fits with other research
Yakubova et al. (2021) also helped an adolescent master daily tasks, but they used home-made videos instead of speed drills. Both studies ended with quicker, cleaner skills, showing two roads to the same goal.
Mulder et al. (2020) worked with older students with ID for two full school years. Their long view adds weight to Vascelli’s short burst: even brief motor timing can slot into bigger self-care plans.
Gureasko-Moore et al. (2006) used a similar single-case design with ADHD teens. The pattern is the same—track, teach, test—no matter the label.
Why it matters
You can add five-minute Big 6 + 6 timing sheets to any session. No extra toys, just a clipboard and a timer. If a teen’s fingers move faster on drills, everyday tasks like dressing or cooking can also speed up without direct teaching.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick one fine-motor target (e.g., finger taps) and one gross-motor target (e.g., toe raises), time 30-second bursts, chart frequency, then test a real task like buttoning.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The current study evaluated the effects of training Big 6 + 6 motor skills on untrained daily living skills. Precision teaching suggests that improved speed of component behaviors can lead to better performance of composite skills. Researchers used a pre-post probe single-subject design to evaluate the effects of frequency building on the motor tasks of push and grasp, as well as the associated effects on the composite skills prior to and following intervention on the component skills. Results suggest that the participant increased his frequencies on all of the component skills. The speed and accuracy of composite skills were higher following the intervention. Researchers also assessed for generalization to other significant contexts.
Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2020 · doi:10.1007/s40617-020-00471-6