ABA Fundamentals

The effects of social punishment on noncompliance: a comparison with timeout and positive practice.

Doleys et al. (1976) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1976
★ The Verdict

A calm reprimand plus a disappointed look beat timeout and extra-practice drills for quick non-compliance in kids with ID.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running school or clinic sessions for children with intellectual disability who want a low-effort first step.
✗ Skip if Those already using multi-component reward systems where reprimands are contraindicated.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Four children with intellectual disability kept ignoring teacher requests.

The team tried three quick fixes: a short reprimand plus a disappointed look, a two-minute sit-out, or repeating the task five times.

Each day the teacher rotated the fixes so the kids served as their own comparison.

02

What they found

The simple reprimand mix won. It cut refusal faster and the teacher used it less often.

Timeout and the repeat-the-task drill needed more repeats to get the same drop.

03

How this fits with other research

Walker (1993) later looked at dozens of studies and agreed: programs that pair small social rewards work better than timeout alone.

Clark et al. (1973) had shown timeout can work, but they used it on a single noisy tic, not broad non-compliance, and the child had no ID.

Burrows et al. (2018) remind us timeout still has a place, yet staff need hands-on role-play training to run it right.

04

Why it matters

You now have a cheap first-line tool: calm words plus a brief disapproving glance. Try it before you set up chairs for timeout or plan extra practice loops. It saves minutes and may give you faster compliance with less effort.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

When a child ignores a request, lock eyes, say 'We follow directions,' give a brief stern look, then immediately re-state the cue.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
multielement
Sample size
4
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

The effects of social punishment, positive practice, and timeout on the noncompliant behavior of four mentally retarded children were assessed in a multitreatment withdrawal design. When programmed, the experimental procedure occurred contigent on non-compliance to experimenter-issued commands. Commands were given at 55-sec intervals throughout each experimental session. The results showed (1) lower levels of noncompliance with social punishment than with the positive-practice or timeout conditions, and (2) that relatively few applications of social punishment were required to obtain this effect. The advantages of social punishment over other punishment procedures, considerations to be made before using it, and the various aspects of the procedure that contribute to its effectiveness were discussed.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1976 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1976.9-471