The effects of noncontingent access to food on the rate of object mouthing across three settings.
Free food on a timer can cut object mouthing in half across class, play room, and hallway.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team gave free bites of food all day long. They wanted to see if this would stop kids from chewing on toys.
They watched the same children in three places: class, play room, and hallway.
Every few minutes the child got a cracker or piece of fruit no matter what they were doing.
What they found
Object mouthing dropped in every room once the food was available.
The decrease stayed steady across all three settings.
Free food worked like a plug-in substitute for mouth play.
How this fits with other research
Parsons et al. (1990) saw the same thing with rumination. Unlimited cereal at meals almost wiped the behavior out.
Koegel et al. (2014) tried the trick with toys instead of food. For most kids the toys helped, but one child mouthed more.
Van Arsdale et al. (2024) looked at 15 newer feeding studies. They say teams now use noncontingent food in many ways, but few spell out the rules. Our 2003 paper is one of the clearest maps they cite.
Why it matters
If a client keeps putting objects in their mouth, try handing them a safe snack on a timer. No need to wait for the behavior first. Set the timer, deliver the bite, and watch the mouthing fade in every room you use it.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick a safe bite-size food, set a 2-minute timer, and deliver it no matter what the child is doing.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Object mouthing is associated with several potential deleterious side effects. In the current investigation, we modified the use of noncontingent access to competing items (food) and evaluated the effects of the treatment on object mouthing across three settings. Results demonstrated reductions in mouthing associated with the modified treatment.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2003 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-579