ABA Fundamentals

The combined effects of noncontingent reinforcement and punishment on the reduction of rumination

DeRosa et al. (2016) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2016
★ The Verdict

Handing out bite-size snacks on a fixed clock plus a quick facial screen can almost stop rumination cold.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating post-meal regurgitation in school or day-program settings.
✗ Skip if Teams that avoid all punishment procedures, even brief and mild ones.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with one client who kept bringing food back up after meals.

They gave the client a bite of a favorite snack every few minutes no matter what.

At the same time they used a quick facial screen—briefly covering the face—for each rumination.

They tracked how often the behavior happened across school days.

02

What they found

Rumination dropped by 96.5% compared with baseline.

The client kept the food down during most sessions once the package started.

03

How this fits with other research

Cooper et al. (2023) got a similar drop using only chewing gum, no punishment.

That looks like a clash, but the gum gave the mouth a job all day—so it also removed the reinforcer.

Ayvaci et al. (2024) reviewed thirty studies and found antecedent reinforcement plus punishment beats either part alone, backing the big effect seen here.

Migan-Gandonou Horr et al. (2021) paired noncontingent attention with extinction and hit a 98.5% cut in perseverative speech, showing the NCR-plus pattern works across topographies.

04

Why it matters

If you face automatic rumination, you can start with safe, noncontingent edibles right away.

Add a brief, mild punisher only if the data stall.

Track each meal period so you know when to fade the extras.

The combo gives you a fast, teacher-friendly option before moving to more intrusive steps.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Serve a preferred nibble every five minutes after lunch while blocking the first rumination with a three-second face cover and collect data.

02At a glance

Intervention
noncontingent reinforcement
Design
single case other
Sample size
1
Population
not specified
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
very large

03Original abstract

The current study extends the literature on the assessment and treatment of rumination through the evaluation of a combined reinforcement- and punishment-based intervention. The study included a single participant with a history of rumination maintained by automatic reinforcement, as identified via a functional analysis. Both noncontingent reinforcement (NCR) with preferred edible items and punishment, in the form of a facial screen, were implemented separately to evaluate their independent effects on the occurrence of rumination. The final treatment package included both NCR and punishment procedures. Implementation of the combined treatment resulted in a 96.5% reduction in rumination relative to baseline. Procedural modifications and integrity errors also were evaluated.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2016 · doi:10.1002/jaba.304