ABA Fundamentals

Suppression of pica by water mist and aromatic ammonia. A comparative analysis.

Rojahn et al. (1987) · Behavior modification 1987
★ The Verdict

Water mist beat ammonia for pica, yet later studies show you can get the same drop without any punishment at all.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating pica in teens with autism or ID.
✗ Skip if Clinicians already using full positive-only packages.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

One teen with autism and intellectual disability kept eating non-food items.

The team compared two punishers: a quick water-mist spray versus a sniff of ammonia.

They switched the punishers day-by-day until pica stopped.

02

What they found

Water mist worked faster and kept pica near zero for three months.

Ammonia caused a brief spike in pica before it dropped.

No new problem behaviors showed up.

03

How this fits with other research

Lord et al. (1986) got rid of pica without any punishment at all. They only changed staff attention and removed a safety helmet.

Thomas et al. (2023) later showed parents can do the same with a home package of toys, brief interruption, and small fines.

These studies seem to clash, but they differ in two ways: the 1987 study tested single punishers in a clinic, while the later work used multi-part plans at home or school.

All three papers show large pica reduction; the newer ones prove you can reach the same goal without aversives.

04

Why it matters

If you face dangerous pica, start with a functional assessment and positive supports first.

If you must add punishment, a quick water mist can work, but newer parent-friendly packages give the same drop with no social fallout.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a 10-minute functional analysis of pica first; add a competing item or brief DR plan before trying any punisher.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
alternating treatments
Sample size
1
Population
autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

This study compared the effects of water mist and aromatic ammonia for the suppression of pica behavior in a severely retarded, autistic adolescent. The water mist program reduced the target behavior rapidly and effectively, whereas the ammonia program did so only after a strong increase during the first two sessions. No negative collateral effects on other inappropriate behaviors occurred during either one of the two treatments. Water mist maintained almost complete suppression of pica behavior during 3 months of daily follow-up sessions in the subject's natural environment.

Behavior modification, 1987 · doi:10.1177/01454455870111005