Stimulus control in the goldfish after massed extinction.
Sprinkle a little reinforcement during extinction to sharpen stimulus control.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers worked with goldfish in a tank. They first taught the fish to poke a light for food.
Next they turned the light off and watched the fish stop poking. Some fish got a surprise food pellet now and then. Others got nothing.
What they found
Fish that saw an odd pellet during extinction learned the difference faster. They poked only when the light was on.
Fish that got zero food kept poking at dim lights. Their stimulus control stayed fuzzy.
How this fits with other research
Snapper et al. (1969) ran the same test with pigeons. They also saw sharper control when birds could tell S+ from S-.
Powell et al. (1968) added extra training days. More days made the gradient even steeper, backing up the dose idea.
Sailor (1971) later showed that sharp control protects against hunger swings. The birds kept choosing correctly even when very hungry.
Why it matters
Mix a few reinforcers into extinction to clean up stimulus control. You will see fewer mistakes to similar cues. Try it when fading prompts or thinning schedules. One extra treat every minute or two can lock in the right response.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →During prompt fading, give one reinforcer every 30-60 s while withholding the rest. Watch errors drop.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Compared with the data of goldfish trained only with stimuli correlated with reinforcement, interspersed reinforcement-stimulus and extinction-stimulus trials resulted in sharper stimulus control and a marked reduction in the percentage of key-presses emitted in the presence of stimuli located near the extinction stimulus on the test dimension. If non-reinforced trials were not interspersed with reinforced trials, there was no sharpening of stimulus control and less reduction in key presses in the presence of stimuli near the extinction stimulus on the test dimension.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1969 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-565