ABA Fundamentals

Stimulus and subject control of schedule-induced drinking.

Keehn et al. (1971) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1971
★ The Verdict

Schedule-induced drinking surges after large meals and at extinction onset, but meal size, history and bout rules shape the effect.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who use fixed schedules or large edible reinforcers in clinic or home sessions.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only with verbal adults on non-food contingencies.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Thompson et al. (1971) watched rats drink water while food arrived on a fixed schedule.

They changed meal size and started extinction to see when extra drinking appeared.

A lever let some rats turn the water off to test if that would stop the drinking.

02

What they found

Bigger meals made the rats drink more.

Drinking spiked the moment food stopped, then faded.

When rats could shut the water off, they did—until long empty gaps made drinking return.

03

How this fits with other research

Reid et al. (1987) later showed drinking does not keep rising with meal size; it peaks in the middle and then falls.

Reid et al. (1983) found the same meal-size lift but traced it to how food behaviors spread through the session, not to the food itself.

López‐Tolsa et al. (2026) flipped the story: after a short no-water phase, rats that still got the food schedule drank less, showing past water loss can suppress later adjunctive drinking.

Together the four papers say: large meals spark drinking, but history, timing and bout rules fine-tune the effect.

04

Why it matters

If you run reinforcement schedules with clients, watch for collateral behaviors like sipping or chewing right after big reinforcers or when reinforcement pauses.

Adjust reinforcer size, session length, or access to other items to keep these side behaviors at helpful, not harmful, levels.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Cut reinforcer size or offer a brief toy break after big edible payouts to keep adjunctive drinking or mouthing low.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Sample size
3
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

Responding in three food-deprived rats was reinforced on schedules in which reinforcement periods (fixed-ratio 1 or 2 for 1, 3, 6, 9, 14, or 21 reinforcers) alternated with extinction intervals. Schedule-induced drinking occurred and was mostly confined to the onset of extinction intervals. Drink durations were longer after 21-pellet meals but were not reliably different after 1, 3, 6, or 9-pellet meals. When termination of the extinction intervals was response dependent, schedule-induced drinking diminished until minimum extinction intervals of 15, 30, and 60 sec were introduced.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1971 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1971.16-257