ABA Fundamentals

Response suppression produced by vestibular stimulation in the rat.

Riccio et al. (1968) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1968
★ The Verdict

Vestibular spinning reliably shuts down learned responses, giving us a measurable model for motion-induced avoidance.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who treat motion or sensory avoidance in kids or want an animal model of suppression.
✗ Skip if Clinicians focused only on verbal behavior or academic tasks with no sensory component.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Seven rats pressed a lever for food on different schedules. While they worked, the cage slowly spun. The spin speed went up in steps. The team watched how spinning changed the rats' pressing.

The spin acted like a strong vestibular stimulus. Think of a kid getting dizzy on a merry-go-round. The study asked: does motion sickness stop learned behavior?

02

What they found

Faster spinning cut pressing to almost zero. The drop was smooth and quick. Different schedules showed different pause patterns, but all showed suppression.

When the spinning stopped, pressing came back. The effect was reliable across all seven animals.

03

How this fits with other research

BOLLEHOFFMAN et al. (1964) saw the same total shutdown, but they used fear instead of spinning. Both studies prove that strong outside events can pause schedule-controlled behavior.

Hake et al. (1969) got the same pause by simply making the feedback light stay on longer. Together these papers show many roads lead to response suppression.

PREMACK et al. (1963) looks opposite at first glance. They trained rats to freeze and found drugs that broke the freeze. Yet both labs measured how outside forces start or stop behavior, linking motion, fear, and immobility under the ABA fundamentals roof.

04

Why it matters

You now have a clean animal model for motion-related avoidance. If a client gags in the car or refuses to swing, vestibular stimulation may be the trigger. Test gradual exposure, measure response rates, and watch for schedule effects just like these rats. The data remind you that strong sensory input can override reinforcement—so pair new motion with strong reinforcers and go slow.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Track how spinning, swinging, or car rides change your client's response rate—then break the motion into smaller, reinforced steps.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
7
Population
not specified
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

Seven rats were trained to stable performance levels on either Fixed Ratio 47, Variable Ratio 47, Variable Interval 1-min, or Fixed Interval 1-min schedules of food reinforcement. Subjects were then tested for sensitivity to vestibular stimulation from rotation, using an ascending method of limits technique with increments in velocity of one revolution per minute every 5 min. Centrifugal forces were minimized by locating the test chamber over the axis of rotation. Response rates decreased in all subjects as a function of increasing rotation speed. In addition, characteristic differences in the patterns of response decrement were found between subjects on ratio and on interval schedules. Repeated tests indicated high intra-subject reliability in sensitivity to rotation. Similarities of these data to "motion sickness" phenomena in other species were noted. It is suggested that this behavioral approach provides a sensitive and quantifiable technique for assessing the effects of vestibular stimulation in animals.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1968 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11-479