ABA Fundamentals

Response rate under varying frequency of non-contingent reinforcement.

Lachter et al. (1971) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1971
★ The Verdict

Dense free reinforcers can first spark, then sink, response rates within the same session.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running NCR or sensory breaks in clinic or classroom.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only use contingent token boards.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team watched how often rats pressed a lever when free food dropped at different speeds.

No press was needed to get the food. The food just arrived on its own clock.

They tracked the lever presses minute-by-minute inside each session.

02

What they found

At first, more free food made the rats press faster.

After a while, the same free food made them press slower.

The curve looked like an upside-down U: up, then down.

03

How this fits with other research

Cameron et al. (1996) later saw the same minute-by-minute swings when free food topped 120 pieces an hour.

Storch et al. (2012) moved the idea to kids with autism. They showed that mixing two so-so snacks mid-session can pep up responding again, just like the brief rise D et al. saw.

WEINELong (1963) had already shown that richer schedules can lift rates, but D et al. proved the lift can flip to a drop inside one sitting.

04

Why it matters

When you use non-contingent reinforcement, expect a short burst of work, then a slump.

Watch the clock. If responding fades after ten minutes, add a brief change of item or task to reset the curve.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Graph responses minute-by-minute; if you see a dip after the first third, swap in a fresh toy or snack for two minutes.

02At a glance

Intervention
noncontingent reinforcement
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
other
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

Two White Carneaux hen pigeons were exposed to a 60-sec random-interval baseline procedure. Six different exteroceptive stimuli were successively correlated, within a single session, with blocks of 10 reinforcement presentations. Following this training, a non-contingent reinforcement procedure was instated with inter-reinforcement intervals of 5, 15, 30, 60, 120, and 240 sec. Within a single session, each non-contingent frequency was correlated with one of the previously presented discriminative stimuli. After an initial increase in the rate of responding as the result of a high density of non-contingent reinforcements, the rate declined as exposure to each non-contingent frequency was prolonged.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1971 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1971.15-233