ABA Fundamentals

Reinforcement Contingency Learning in Children with ADHD: Back to the Basics of Behavior Therapy.

H et al. (2019) · 2019
★ The Verdict

Gradual ratio stretching lets kids with ADHD reach lean reinforcement schedules without losing learning speed or extinction resistance.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running skill-acquisition programs for children with ADHD in clinic or classroom settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only use fixed dense schedules or work with non-ADHD populations.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Voss et al. (2019) tested how kids with ADHD handle thinner reinforcement schedules.

They slowly stretched the ratio—requiring more correct responses before each payoff.

Both ADHD and neurotypical children completed the same gradual schedule thinning.

02

What they found

Kids with ADHD learned the task just as fast as their peers.

When reinforcement stopped, both groups kept responding about the same length of time.

The old idea that ADHD brains can't handle partial reinforcement was not supported.

03

How this fits with other research

Pilowsky et al. (1998) saw the opposite: ADHD children gave up faster under partial payoff.

The gap is about method—T used sudden lean schedules; H stretched them slowly.

Cullinan et al. (2001) and Mueller et al. (2000) also used gradual timing shifts and got good self-control, backing the slow-stretch idea.

04

Why it matters

You can thin reinforcement for ADHD learners without hurting learning or stamina.

Start rich, then stretch the ratio a little each day—no need to stay on continuous payoff forever.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add one extra response requirement to the current reinforcement schedule each session, watching for accuracy to stay above 80%.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
quasi experimental
Sample size
111
Population
adhd, neurotypical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
medium

03Original abstract

Reinforcement deficits in ADHD may affect basic operant learning processes relevant for Behavioral Treatment. Behavior acquired under partial reinforcement extinguishes less readily after the discontinuation of reinforcement than behavior acquired under continuous reinforcement, a phenomenon known as the Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect [PREE], which has great relevance for the emergence of behavioral persistence. The present study examined acquisition and extinction of operant responding under partial and continuous reinforcement in children with and without ADHD. In addition, we evaluated the effectiveness of gradual stretching the reinforcement rate during acquisition for remedying potential acquisition or extinction deficits under partial reinforcement in ADHD. In an operant learning task designed to mimic the task confronted by an animal in a Skinner box, 62 typically developing and 49 children with ADHD (age: 8-12) were presented with a continuous, partial or gradually stretching reinforcement scheme followed by extinction. Both groups of children acquired the instrumental response more slowly and exhibited more behavioral persistence (reduced extinction) when responding was initially reinforced under partial relative to continuous reinforcement, with no differences between groups. Progressive ratio stretching resulted in faster acquisition than partial reinforcement yet promoted equal behavioral persistence, again without differences between ADHD and TD groups. Unlike suggested by previous research, children with ADHD exhibit neither an acquisition deficit under partial reinforcement nor a deficit in PREE. Of relevance for Behavioral Treatment, gradual reinforcement stretching can be used to facilitate response acquisition over purely partial reinforcement while maintaining equal behavioral persistence upon reward discontinuation.

, 2019 · doi:10.1007/s10802-019-00572-z