PUNISHMENT BY NOISE IN AN ALTERNATIVE RESPONSE SITUATION.
Brief noise punishes far better when the person can immediately switch to an unpunished response.
01Research in Context
What this study did
CASSOTTA et al. (1964) worked with neurotypical adults in a small lab room.
Each person could press either of two buttons for coins.
A brief loud noise followed one button, but the other button stayed quiet.
The team then removed the safe button so only the punished one remained.
They tracked how noise alone changed pressing across both setups.
What they found
Noise cut button pressing almost in half when the safe button was there.
When the safe button was gone, the same noise barely slowed pressing.
Having an unpunished escape route made the punisher far stronger.
How this fits with other research
Virues-Ortega et al. (2013) swapped punishment for non-contingent reinforcement and saw the same pattern: alternatives alone do not drive suppression.
The two studies together show that safety, not just choice, is the key ingredient.
O'Reilly et al. (2000) looked at noise from the other side; they used noise as an aversive background that increased escape behavior.
Their earplug fix and L’s safe button both point to the same clinical rule: give the client a quick, quiet way out and problem behavior drops.
Oliver et al. (2002) review warns that punishment data are thin; this 1964 finding is still one of the clearest human lab examples we have.
Why it matters
When you must use a punisher, always pair it with an easy, reinforced alternative response.
The alternative does not dilute the lesson; it multiplies the suppression and gives the learner control.
Next time you withhold tokens, add a time-out, or block a ritual, ask: is there a safe button this client can hit right now?
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Before you apply a punisher, program a reinforced alternative response the client can emit at the same moment.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Operant responses of human subjects were conditioned according to a variable-interval schedule of positive reinforcement. A brief noise was delivered as punishment for each of the responses. The noise suppressed the punished responses more when an alternative unpunished response was concurrently available than when only a single punished response was available. This finding extends the generality of a previous study that had used a period of extinction rather than the brief noise as the punishing stimulus.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1964 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-185