ABA Fundamentals

Pictorial target control of schedule-induced attack in White Carneaux pigeons.

Looney et al. (1974) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1974
★ The Verdict

Pictures can replace live targets to trigger schedule-induced aggression in pigeons.

✓ Read this if BCBAs studying adjunctive or schedule-induced behavior in lab settings.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for direct client interventions—this is basic animal research.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team placed hungry White Carneaux pigeons on a fixed-interval food schedule.

While the birds waited for grain, pictures of other pigeons were shown on a screen.

The researchers counted how often each bird pecked or struck the picture.

02

What they found

The pigeons attacked the pictures most when the image was an upright silhouette.

When food stopped, the attacks stopped too.

Pictures alone can trigger schedule-induced attack, not just real birds.

03

How this fits with other research

Dove (1976) later showed that hungrier birds attack a mirror more, linking body weight to strength of attack.

Uchino et al. (2014) used the same mirror set-up but trained birds to peck calmly, proving the response can be flipped from aggression to self-recognition.

Segal (1962) found that visual ‘clocks’ control timing, while Tracey et al. (1974) show visual targets control aggression—together they prove visual cues can steer very different pigeon behaviors under similar schedules.

04

Why it matters

You now know that pictures, not just live peers, can evoke attack during reinforcement gaps. If you run schedule-induced behavior studies, you can replace live targets with easy-to-change images, cutting animal welfare risks and giving tighter stimulus control. Try inserting a picture condition the next time you study adjunctive behavior.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a pictorial target to your next pigeon study instead of a live bird.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
8
Population
other
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Three pigeons with a history of attacking a mirror target, and two of six pigeons with no prior exposure to targets, attacked a colored photograph of a conspecific during exposure to intermittent schedules of reinforcement for key pecking. Rate of attack on the photograph decreased when the reinforcement schedule was removed. The topography, temporal pattern, and locus of attack on the picture were comparable to schedule-induced attack on live, stuffed, and mirror targets. When silhouette, outline, and plain paper targets were used, schedule-induced attack was more sensitive to a change in target characteristics with a concurrent target-preference procedure than with an analogous successive-testing procedure. The combined results of the two testing procedures indicated that an "upright" white-on-black silhouette of a pigeon with or without an eye was more effective in controlling attack than was a comparable "inverted" silhouette, an outline of a pigeon, or a piece of colored paper.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1974 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.21-571