Pedestrian jaywalking under facilitating and nonfacilitating conditions.
Shorten wait times or add clear pedestrian cues to keep clients from crossing against the light.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers watched three crosswalks in a city. They timed how long the walk signal stayed red.
When the wait was long, more people crossed against the light. When the wait was short, fewer people did.
The study showed that signal time alone can control pedestrian behavior.
What they found
Longer red lights made jaywalking go up. Shorter red lights made it go down.
The effect happened every time they tested it.
How this fits with other research
Myers et al. (2022) later asked what the pedestrian can do. They found that a simple hand gesture makes drivers stop more often. Together the two studies show both sides of the street: short waits keep walkers compliant, and clear signals make drivers yield.
Parsons et al. (1981) had already shown that long delays punish watching for a cue. The 1982 study moves that lab idea to real sidewalks. Long light waits work like the long delays in the lab: people stop waiting and act on their own.
Ainslie et al. (2003) bundled rat treats to stretch self-control. The crosswalk study bundles time the opposite way: it chops a long wait into a short one, and compliance rises. Both papers say the same thing—when you shrink the delay, you grow the good behavior.
Why it matters
You can’t change city lights during a community outing, but you can pick the right corner. Choose crosswalks with short signal cycles for practice walks. If you must use a long-cycle light, teach the client to wait behind the pole and give the big hand signal shown in Myers et al. (2022). These two moves—short waits plus clear cues—cut jaywalking before it starts.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Scope out the shortest-light crosswalk on your next community trip and rehearse waiting there.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Each year, thousands of pedestrians are killed or injured while crossing streets in the United States. Pedestrians who jaywalk across busy intersections increase their risk of being injured by an automobile. The present series of studies investigated pedestrian jaywalking behaviors under temporal conditions which appeared to control noncompliance and compliance with pedestrian walk signs. An intersection involving three major streets was the target site of the studies. The timing of walk and no-walk light sequences was different in the clockwise and counterclockwise direction and produced differential delays. In three separate studies, significantly more pedestrians jaywalked when walking in the long-delay as opposed to short-delay direction. Traffic planners might use these findings to establish safer pedestrian signal systems.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1982 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-469