ABA Fundamentals

PARTIAL NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT: FIXED-RATIO ESCAPE.

HENDRY et al. (1963) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1963
★ The Verdict

Escape alone is too weak to maintain steady work; pair it with positive reinforcers and keep breaks lean.

✓ Read this if BCBAs designing programs for escape-maintained avoidance or non-compliance.
✗ Skip if Practitioners who only use positive reinforcement with no escape component.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team set up a lever for lab rats. Every eighth press turned off a mild shock. This is called a fixed-ratio 8 escape schedule.

Water was available in some sessions. In others, the bottle was removed. The scientists tracked how often the rats pressed during each condition.

02

What they found

Without water, lever pressing slowed and almost stopped. When the bottle was taken away, the drop got worse.

Pure escape could not keep the ratio going. The rats needed an extra reinforcer to work steadily.

03

How this fits with other research

Rincover et al. (1975) later repeated the same -FR 8 with monkeys and saw the same weak escape. Their study confirms the original warning: escape alone is fragile.

Dallemagne et al. (1970) looks like a contradiction at first. Their rats held shock down for hours under a titration schedule. The difference is control. In titration, every press instantly cuts shock, so the payoff is clear and immediate.

Frank-Crawford et al. (2021) and Fulton et al. (2020) took the lesson to children. They showed that lean, accumulated breaks can outperform dense, tiny ones. Less frequent escape kept problem behavior low, echoing the lab finding that too much free escape weakens responding.

04

Why it matters

If you are running escape-based interventions, do not rely on breaks alone. Add preferred items, attention, or tokens to keep the behavior strong. Start lean and let the client earn bigger, less frequent breaks instead of dripping tiny ones. This combo protects compliance and reduces problem behavior.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Give a 5-minute preferred activity after 10 tasks instead of 30-second breaks after each task.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Population
not specified
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

Rats were unable to sustain performance when eight bar-presses turned off shock (-FR 8). In a second experiment, thirsty rats were able to maintain a moderate response rate when performance on -FR 8 was also reinforced with water. Some rats continued to bar-press on -FR 8 after withdrawal of positive reinforcement, but at a much lower rate. A possible explanation of the results is that during intermittent escape conditioning in a free-responding situation the absence of shock itself acquires aversive properties.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1963 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-519