ABA Fundamentals

In pursuit of general behavioral relations.

Mace (1996) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1996
★ The Verdict

Stack reinforcement before hard tasks to boost persistence, then test if the same relation holds across clients and settings.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who want a sturdy, portable principle for tough sessions.
✗ Skip if Clinicians looking for step-by-step skill programs instead of theory.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Williams (1996) wrote a theory paper. It asked one big question. Can we treat behavioral momentum like a law that works everywhere?

The paper listed ways to test this. Run the same procedure with new people. Swap settings. Change reinforcers. See if the relation holds.

02

What they found

The review found no final answer. Instead it gave a road map. More reinforcement should make behavior stick better. We need multi-lab tests to be sure.

03

How this fits with other research

Davison et al. (2005) extends the call. They warn that science rewards flashy new results. This slows the replication tests Williams (1996) wants.

Jacobs (2019) gives a tool for the job. Randomization tests fit single-case data. You can pool small studies to check generality without big groups.

Joslyn et al. (2024) shows a quick metric. Risk ratios turn everyday ABC data into numbers you can compare across clients. This answers the 1996 plea for simple, shared measures.

04

Why it matters

You can act on momentum today. Load reinforcement first in a tough task. Then present the hard demand. If the client stays engaged, you just saw momentum. Track it with risk ratios or randomization tests. Share the data so the field can build the general law Williams (1996) imagined.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a 2-minute high-reinforcement warm-up, then slide into the hardest demand of the day and count how long the client stays put.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
narrative review
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Efforts to develop behavioral technologies from advances in basic research assume that results from studies with nonhuman subjects can, in some instances, be applied to human behavior. The behavioral principles likely to be most useful for application are those that represent robust general behavioral relations. Basic and applied research on behavioral momentum suggests that there is a general behavioral relation between the persistence of behavior and the rate of reinforcement obtained in a given situation. Understanding the factors that affect behavioral persistence may have important implications for applied behavior analysts that justify studies aimed at establishing the generality and limits of the functional relation between reinforcement rate and behavioral persistence. Strategies for establishing the generality of behavioral relations are reviewed, followed by a brief summary of the evidence for the generality of behavioral momentum.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1996 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-557