Habit reversal as a treatment for chronic skin picking: a pilot investigation.
Habit reversal beats doing nothing for adult skin picking and the gain lasts three months.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Adults who pick their skin joined a small wait-list study. Half got habit reversal right away. The rest waited, then got the same package later.
The package taught them to spot the urge, clench a fist for one minute, and breathe. They also learned to relax and use a helper at home.
What they found
Skin picking dropped for the habit-reversal group. The drop stayed for three months.
The wait-list group did not change until they got the same training.
How this fits with other research
Jeglum et al. (2022) later tried a different plan. They used soft toys and music instead of habit reversal. Their adult with autism also stopped picking and kept the gain for five months.
Mellitz et al. (1983) used a self-talk trick to stop compulsive looking. Like the skin study, the person worked alone and the behavior vanished.
Levin et al. (2014) showed most skin picking runs on automatic, not social, payoff. That backs up why sensory-based plans like habit reversal or competing items can work.
Why it matters
You now have two cheap tools for adult skin picking: habit reversal or competing items plus NCR. Pick the one the client will use. Start with a brief functional check. If the picking looks automatic, teach the fist-clench or hand them a fidget. Track for at least three months to be sure the habit stays gone.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Teach one adult client the 60-second fist-clench competing response and log daily picks.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of habit reversal (HR) to a wait-list control as a treatment for chronic skin picking in adults. Twenty-five adults with a chronic skin-picking problem were randomly assigned to a wait-list control or HR group. At pretreatment, posttreatment, and a 3-month follow-up, self-reported skin picking was assessed, and photographs were taken of the damaged areas and later rated by independent observers. Treatment acceptability data were collected at posttreatment only. Results showed that HR produced a greater decrease in skin picking at posttreatment and follow-up when compared to the wait-list control group. Data from the independent raters confirmed these findings. HR was also viewed as an acceptable intervention by the participants.
Behavior modification, 2006 · doi:10.1177/0145445504265707