ABA Fundamentals

Experimental control of superstitious responding inhumans.

CATANIA et al. (1963) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1963
★ The Verdict

A short pause between choices can wipe out behavior that is only kept going by lucky timing.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who see odd, persistent responses that do not contact clear reinforcement
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with clearly reinforced problem behavior

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

College students sat at a table with two buttons. A light blinked every few seconds. If the student pressed the right button when the light came on, they earned a coin.

The trick: the coin came no matter which button they pressed. The students got rich by accident. The researchers then added a two-second pause, called a changeover delay (COD), between switching buttons.

02

What they found

The pause broke the lucky streak. Superstitious button pressing dropped to almost zero. The COD stopped the accidental payoff from following the switch.

03

How this fits with other research

Neuringer (1969) later showed that a red light meaning "no money" worked even faster than a delay. Both tricks stop accidental reinforcement, but the signal beats the wait.

Carr et al. (2002) moved the idea into therapy rooms. They gave kids free toys during a functional analysis. The free toys cut problem behavior the same way the COD cut superstitious presses.

Aznar et al. (2005) did the same during tooth-brushing. Free sensory toys slashed biting and screaming. Again, noncontingent stuff broke the accidental payoff chain.

04

Why it matters

If a client keeps doing a quirky response that never earns real reinforcement, insert a brief pause or give free access to a strong alternative. Either move breaks the accident that keeps the superstition alive.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Add a two-second pause before the client can switch tasks or materials.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Population
neurotypical
Finding
negative

03Original abstract

Superstitions were demonstrated with human subjects when presses on one button were reinforced on a VI 30-sec schedule while presses on a second were never reinforced. Superstitious responding, on the second button, was often maintained because presses on that button were frequently followed by reinforcement for a subsequent press on the first button. The introduction of a changeover delay (COD), which separated in time presses on the second button and subsequent reinforced presses on the first button, reduced or eliminated the superstitious responding of these subjects. Some complex superstitions were also demonstrated with other subjects for which the COD was in effect from the beginning of the session.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1963 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-203