Examination of an antecedent communication intervention to reduce tangibly maintained challenging behavior: a controlled analog analysis.
Ask for the item first, then give it—antecedent FCT erases tangible-maintained problem behavior.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three students with developmental delay took part. Each child hit, screamed, or grabbed when toys were nearby but not in reach.
The team used an ABAB design. In baseline, the toy sat on the table and problem behavior was measured. In treatment, the adult first taught the child to say or sign “toy please,” then placed the item in view. No extra prompts were given later.
What they found
Problem behavior dropped to near zero for every child once they had to mand before the toy appeared. The effect returned when the rule was removed, then came back again when the rule returned.
How this fits with other research
Lambert et al. (2017) built on this idea. They chained several mands in a row instead of one. Their serial FCT kept problem behavior low even when reinforcement later stopped.
Stevens et al. (2018) added lag schedules. Kids had to vary their requests up to five different ways. Problem behavior stayed low and mands stayed fresh, showing the antecedent trick keeps working when you stretch it.
McGonigle et al. (2014) moved the same logic to adults with Rett syndrome. They used a voice-output switch instead of speech or sign, yet the first request still cut problem behavior.
Why it matters
You can stop tangible battles before they start. Put the item out of reach, prompt one quick mand, then hand it over. No need to wait for problem behavior. Try it next session: place the iPad on a high shelf, wait for “iPad please,” and deliver immediately. One simple rule can save ten minutes of escalation.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Place the reinforcer in sight but out of reach, prompt one mand, and deliver on the first clear request.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We examined the influence of an antecedent communication intervention on challenging behavior for three students with developmental disorders. Students were taught to request tangible items that were identified as reinforcers for challenging behavior in a prior functional analysis. Individual participant multielement and reversal designs were used to compare the effects of the antecedent communication intervention versus a no antecedent communication intervention condition. Immediately following the antecedent manipulations students were exposed to the tangible condition of the functional analysis. Results indicate that the antecedent communication intervention reduced challenging behavior in the subsequent tangible test condition for all three students. The importance of examining antecedent interventions to treat challenging behavior from a function analytic perspective is discussed.
Research in developmental disabilities, 2012 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.017