ABA Fundamentals

Evaluation of multiple schedules with naturally occurring and therapist‐arranged discriminative stimuli following functional communication training

Shamlian et al. (2016) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2016
★ The Verdict

A four-period multiple schedule with clear signals teaches a child to mand only when reinforcement is available.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching manding to children with autism in clinic or home settings
✗ Skip if Practitioners working on pure echoics or listener responding without a mand goal

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team taught a child with autism to ask for toys using picture cards. They set up four clear periods: green card meant toys now, red card meant toys later.

Each period lasted a few minutes. The child could only get toys by asking during the green periods. This is called a multiple schedule.

02

What they found

The child quickly learned to ask only when the green card was up. He stopped asking during red card periods. This shows he could tell the difference between the two contexts.

03

How this fits with other research

Spriggs et al. (2016) ran the same study and got mixed results. They found colored cards helped kids learn faster, but some problem behavior came back. The current paper only reports the mand data, so the stories don't clash - they just focus on different outcomes.

Greer et al. (2016) looked at 25 similar cases and found the same pattern: clear signals like colored cards make schedule thinning safer. The current study is one example in their larger set.

Ramirez et al. (2025) built on this idea by starting with a fixed 60-second green / 240-second red schedule right away. They showed you can move faster if the signals are strong from day one.

04

Why it matters

You can use a four-period multiple schedule to teach a child when requests will work. Pick two clear signals - colored cards, wristbands, or table signs. Start with short periods and praise only when the "available" signal is present. This keeps manding strong while you thin reinforcement. Move to longer periods once the child stops asking during the "not available" signal.

FREE CEUs

Get CEUs on This Topic — Free

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.

60+ on-demand CEUs (ethics, supervision, general)
New live CEU every Wednesday
Community of 500+ BCBAs
100% free to join
Join The ABA Clubhouse — Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick two colored cards, run 2-minute green periods and 2-minute red periods, reinforce mands only during green

02At a glance

Intervention
verbal behavior intervention
Design
single case other
Sample size
1
Population
autism spectrum disorder
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Most verbal behavior curricula for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) focus on teaching multiple mands during the early stages of training (e.g., picture exchange communication system; Bondy & Frost, 1994). However, few, if any, of those curricula train children with ASD to differentially mand only for reinforcers that are reasonable for a caregiver to deliver in a given context (e.g., mands to cuddle at bedtime) and to refrain from manding for reinforcers that would be inappropriate to deliver in that context (e.g., mands to play outside at bedtime). In this study, we first taught a boy with ASD two initial mands. Immediately thereafter we brought those mands under the conditional discriminative control of a four-component multiple schedule with (a) S1 correlated with one reinforcer available (i.e., edibles), (b) S2 correlated with both reinforcers available (i.e., edibles or drink), (c) S3 correlated with another reinforcer available (i.e., drink), and (d) SΔ correlated with no reinforcer available. Following treatment, the child displayed conditionally discriminated manding in accordance with each of the four components of the schedule. We discuss these findings relative to the potential benefits of bringing mands under both evocative and discriminative control.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2016 · doi:10.1002/jaba.293