ABA Fundamentals

Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires.

Carr et al. (2000) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2000
★ The Verdict

Even clients with almost no language can build stimulus equivalence classes, so don’t wait for full verbal skills.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching learners with intellectual disability or limited speech.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who only work with highly verbal clients.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with adults who had intellectual disability and almost no spoken words.

They used matching-to-sample lessons to build new equivalence classes.

Each person learned to pick the correct picture when given a sample, then the researchers tested if the new links popped up without direct teaching.

02

What they found

Three out of three adults in the first group showed full emergent relations.

Only one of two adults in the second group did the same.

The study proved that you do not need rich language to form stimulus classes.

03

How this fits with other research

Almeida-Verdu et al. (2008) later repeated the idea with deaf children who had cochlear implants.

They also saw new relations emerge, showing the method works across different disabilities.

Plazas et al. (2025) now says we should train both select and reject responses for stronger classes.

This update does not erase the 2000 finding; it just gives you a sharper tool to use.

04

Why it matters

If your client has few words, you can still run equivalence training.

Start with simple picture matching and test for untaught relations.

Add the newer detached MTS steps from Plazas et al. (2025) if you want the strongest classes.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a quick picture matching-to-sample probe and test for emergent relations you did not teach.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
5
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

Studies from two different laboratories tested for equivalence classes in individuals with severe mental retardation and minimal verbal repertoires. In the first study, 3 individuals learned several matching-to-sample performances: matching picture comparison stimuli to dictated-word sample stimuli (AB), matching those same pictures to printed letter samples (CB), and also matching the pictures to nonrepresentative forms (DB). On subsequent tests, all individuals immediately displayed Emergent Relations AC, AD, BC, BD, CD, and DC, together constituting a positive demonstration of equivalence (as defined by Sidman). The second study obtained a positive equivalence test outcome in 1 of 2 individuals with similarly minimal verbal repertoires. Taken together, these studies call into question previous assertions that equivalence classes are demonstrable only in individuals with well-developed language repertoires.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2000 · doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-101