Emergence of visual-visual conditional discriminations.
Tact plus intraverbal training lets about half of preschoolers pass untaught visual-visual matches right away.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team taught preschoolers to name pictures and link spoken names. Then they tested if the kids could match the pictures without more teaching.
They worked with neurotypical children. The goal was to see if tact and intraverbal training would create new visual-visual matches.
What they found
Half of the children passed both A-B and B-A visual matches right away. Most kids did not show bidirectional intraverbal naming.
Results were mixed. Some kids got the emergent relations, others did not.
How this fits with other research
Rosales et al. (2012) used stimulus pairing plus extra examples to finish second-language relations. Their positive outcome shows the 2015 mixed result may need more exemplars.
Carnerero et al. (2014) got 90% emergent tact and selection in kids with autism after simple picture-name pairing. The 2015 study extends that logic to neurotypical kids and adds intraverbal links.
Kim et al. (2023) later showed that mixed-operant instruction creates full bidirectional naming in autism. Their success suggests the 2015 probe-only method was too weak for most kids.
Why it matters
You can jump-start visual matching by first teaching tacts and A→B intraverbals. Expect only about half of neurotypical preschoolers to show emergent symmetry without extra support. If a child fails, add multiple exemplars or mixed-operant trials instead of more probes.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →After kids can tact A pictures and say A→B names, probe A-B and B-A matching once; if either fails, add three mixed-exemplar blocks before the next probe.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
We assessed the emergence of visual-visual conditional discriminations following training of vocal tact and intraverbal relations. Ten preschool-age children learned to vocally tact six visual stimuli, A1 through B3. Next, they learned to respond intraverbally to the dictated names of A1, A2, and A3 by vocalizing the names of B1, B2, and B3, respectively. Emergent A-B and B-A relations were tested in a visual-visual match-to-sample (MTS) task. Five of ten participants passed the test, with or without a prompt to tact the sample stimulus. Four of the five failed a reverse intraverbal test that involved responding to dictated names of B stimuli by vocalizing names of A stimuli. The remaining participants failed the MTS test, apparently due to failures to maintain the trained vocal responses throughout testing. Accurate MTS performance in the absence of bidirectional intraverbal relations appears to contradict Horne and Lowe's (1996) analysis of the possible role of intraverbal naming in emergent stimulus control.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2015 · doi:10.1002/jeab.136