ABA Fundamentals

Emergence of visual-visual conditional discriminations.

Petursdottir et al. (2015) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 2015
★ The Verdict

Tact plus intraverbal training lets about half of preschoolers pass untaught visual-visual matches right away.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching early conditional discriminations or stimulus equivalence to preschoolers.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working solely with older learners or direct instruction fans who avoid emergent procedures.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team taught preschoolers to name pictures and link spoken names. Then they tested if the kids could match the pictures without more teaching.

They worked with neurotypical children. The goal was to see if tact and intraverbal training would create new visual-visual matches.

02

What they found

Half of the children passed both A-B and B-A visual matches right away. Most kids did not show bidirectional intraverbal naming.

Results were mixed. Some kids got the emergent relations, others did not.

03

How this fits with other research

Rosales et al. (2012) used stimulus pairing plus extra examples to finish second-language relations. Their positive outcome shows the 2015 mixed result may need more exemplars.

Carnerero et al. (2014) got 90% emergent tact and selection in kids with autism after simple picture-name pairing. The 2015 study extends that logic to neurotypical kids and adds intraverbal links.

Kim et al. (2023) later showed that mixed-operant instruction creates full bidirectional naming in autism. Their success suggests the 2015 probe-only method was too weak for most kids.

04

Why it matters

You can jump-start visual matching by first teaching tacts and A→B intraverbals. Expect only about half of neurotypical preschoolers to show emergent symmetry without extra support. If a child fails, add multiple exemplars or mixed-operant trials instead of more probes.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

After kids can tact A pictures and say A→B names, probe A-B and B-A matching once; if either fails, add three mixed-exemplar blocks before the next probe.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
10
Population
neurotypical
Finding
mixed

03Original abstract

We assessed the emergence of visual-visual conditional discriminations following training of vocal tact and intraverbal relations. Ten preschool-age children learned to vocally tact six visual stimuli, A1 through B3. Next, they learned to respond intraverbally to the dictated names of A1, A2, and A3 by vocalizing the names of B1, B2, and B3, respectively. Emergent A-B and B-A relations were tested in a visual-visual match-to-sample (MTS) task. Five of ten participants passed the test, with or without a prompt to tact the sample stimulus. Four of the five failed a reverse intraverbal test that involved responding to dictated names of B stimuli by vocalizing names of A stimuli. The remaining participants failed the MTS test, apparently due to failures to maintain the trained vocal responses throughout testing. Accurate MTS performance in the absence of bidirectional intraverbal relations appears to contradict Horne and Lowe's (1996) analysis of the possible role of intraverbal naming in emergent stimulus control.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2015 · doi:10.1002/jeab.136