Effects of response type on pigeons' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay.
The way a learner responds does not change how size or speed of reward drives choice.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Researchers worked with pigeons in a small lab chamber.
Birds could earn grain by either pecking a lit key or pressing a small treadle with their foot.
The team kept the grain rules the same for both actions.
They then checked if the birds cared more about bigger grain piles or faster delivery when using each action.
What they found
The pigeons picked the richer, faster option equally often no matter which body part they used.
Key peck or foot press—both told the same story about reinforcer size and timing.
How this fits with other research
Voss et al. (2019) saw children with autism grow more creative in their requests when the reward grew larger.
That looks like the opposite of the pigeon result, but the kids worked on brand-new skills while the birds chose between steady schedules.
Cox et al. (2015) also found that bigger candy did not speed learning for children with autism, matching the pigeon shrug toward magnitude.
Milo et al. (2010) showed kids stay engaged longer when the edible prize rotates, reminding us that variety, not size, can matter more.
Why it matters
When you pick a response form for a learner—touch, point, vocal—this study says the reinforcer rules stay the same.
You can focus on what is easiest or fastest for the child instead of fearing that one motion will make rewards "count" less.
Still run your own brief test: try small and large reinforcers with the target skill and watch the data before you lock the plan.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Run two five-trial probes: deliver the same big reinforcer after a finger touch and after a card exchange, then graph which response stays stronger.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Twelve pigeons, divided into two groups, responded on concurrent nonindependent variable‐interval schedules to obtain access to grain by either pecking keys or pressing treadles. Either the amount of grain or the delay to the receipt of grain was varied in separate conditions to determine the sensitivity of relative responding to variation in reinforcer amount ( s A ), the sensitivity to variation in reinforcer delay ( s D ), and s A / s D , a measure related to self‐control. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the values of s A , s D , and s A / s D . These results suggest that the values of s A , s D , and s A / s D for pigeons may be similar across these two types of responses.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1996 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.66-297