ABA Fundamentals

Effects of response type on pigeons' sensitivity to variation in reinforcer amount and reinforcer delay.

Chelonis et al. (1996) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1996
★ The Verdict

The way a learner responds does not change how size or speed of reward drives choice.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching new response topographies to early learners.
✗ Skip if Clinicians only refining reinforcer variety or quality.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Researchers worked with pigeons in a small lab chamber.

Birds could earn grain by either pecking a lit key or pressing a small treadle with their foot.

The team kept the grain rules the same for both actions.

They then checked if the birds cared more about bigger grain piles or faster delivery when using each action.

02

What they found

The pigeons picked the richer, faster option equally often no matter which body part they used.

Key peck or foot press—both told the same story about reinforcer size and timing.

03

How this fits with other research

Voss et al. (2019) saw children with autism grow more creative in their requests when the reward grew larger.

That looks like the opposite of the pigeon result, but the kids worked on brand-new skills while the birds chose between steady schedules.

Cox et al. (2015) also found that bigger candy did not speed learning for children with autism, matching the pigeon shrug toward magnitude.

Milo et al. (2010) showed kids stay engaged longer when the edible prize rotates, reminding us that variety, not size, can matter more.

04

Why it matters

When you pick a response form for a learner—touch, point, vocal—this study says the reinforcer rules stay the same.

You can focus on what is easiest or fastest for the child instead of fearing that one motion will make rewards "count" less.

Still run your own brief test: try small and large reinforcers with the target skill and watch the data before you lock the plan.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run two five-trial probes: deliver the same big reinforcer after a finger touch and after a card exchange, then graph which response stays stronger.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
12
Population
not specified
Finding
null

03Original abstract

Twelve pigeons, divided into two groups, responded on concurrent nonindependent variable‐interval schedules to obtain access to grain by either pecking keys or pressing treadles. Either the amount of grain or the delay to the receipt of grain was varied in separate conditions to determine the sensitivity of relative responding to variation in reinforcer amount ( s A ), the sensitivity to variation in reinforcer delay ( s D ), and s A / s D , a measure related to self‐control. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the values of s A , s D , and s A / s D . These results suggest that the values of s A , s D , and s A / s D for pigeons may be similar across these two types of responses.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1996 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1996.66-297