Effects of feedback and self-monitoring on head trauma youths' conversation skills.
A small switch in the learner’s hand can boost positive talk as well as staff-run feedback for youths with brain injury.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with youths who had traumatic brain injuries. Each youth wanted better back-and-forth talk with peers.
Kids got two tools. One was a small light that blinked when they said something good. The other was a switch they flipped each time they thought they made a nice comment. Staff watched and also gave spoken feedback.
What they found
Both the light feedback and the flip-switch self-monitoring raised positive conversation turns. Gains showed up later in free chat with no gadgets.
Self-monitoring alone worked just as well as the external light cue plus adult praise.
How this fits with other research
Lincoln et al. (1988) later repeated the idea with deaf adults learning feeling words. Again, simple self-monitoring closed the gap to typical peers.
Burack et al. (2004) looked at middle-schoolers with behavior problems. They saw self-monitoring cut disruption only when adults also gave feedback. That seems opposite, but the 2004 kids had no brain injury and the goal was stopping problem acts, not growing new talk skills.
Minard et al. (2026) updated the mix for preschool teachers. Delayed supervisor feedback plus self-monitoring kept teacher praise high even when the boss was gone.
Why it matters
You can let clients track their own good talk with a simple switch or tally. It saves staff time and still builds real social gains that carry over to recess, lunch, or job breaks. Try giving the learner the clicker first before you add extra feedback.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Hand the client a tally counter and have them click for each nice comment during a 5-minute chat.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The effects of feedback and self-recording on the small group conversational behaviors of two head trauma youths were evaluated. Feedback involved providing clients a light signal corresponding to positive or negative social interactions. The self-monitoring procedure required that the clients flip a switch corresponding with their positive or negative interactions. An A1-B1-C1-A2-C2-B2 design in which the feedback phase (B) and self-monitoring phase (C) were alternated to control for order effects demonstrated the efficacy of both interventions. Performance gains were also shown to generalize to less structured situations, bringing the clients' level of positive responses into a range established with a social comparison group.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1984 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1984.17-353