ABA Fundamentals

Effects of delayed constructed-response identity matching on spelling of dictated words.

Hanna et al. (2004) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 2004
★ The Verdict

Have kids build the word first, then pick it from choices after a short wait—this delayed identity matching teaches spelling that lasts and even spreads to new words.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching spelling or reading to young children in school or clinic settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners working only on non-academic goals like toileting or aggression reduction.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Six first graders took part. The task was simple. Each child built the sample word with letter tiles. Then the tiles were taken away. After a short delay the child saw three choices and had to pick the word they had just built.

The teacher said the word aloud each time. The delay started at two seconds and grew longer as kids got better. Sessions ran during regular class time. No extra drills or worksheets were used.

02

What they found

Every child learned to spell the practiced words. Handwriting also got neater. Two kids went further. They could spell brand-new words made from the same syllables they had trained. The matching game created spelling power without extra teaching.

03

How this fits with other research

Morgan (1988) did the same kind of delayed identity matching with children who had intellectual disabilities. They first taught a simple hand sign for each picture. Once the kids could hold the sign in mind, matching to new pictures appeared right away. The 2004 study swaps the hand sign for building the word with tiles, but the memory trick is the same.

Dube et al. (1998) removed the usual warm-up tests and went straight to matching. Four out of five children with severe ID still learned. Hawley et al. (2004) also skips fancy prep and gets straight to spelling. Both papers show that identity matching can be a fast lane to higher skills when you drop extra rules.

Odom et al. (1986) showed that pigeons match better when they peck many times during the sample. More pecks mean longer looking. Kids in the 2004 study also look longer while they build the word tile by tile. Longer looking seems to help both birds and children remember.

04

Why it matters

You can use this tomorrow. Hand the child letter tiles, say the word, and let them build it. Take the tiles away, wait a few seconds, then give three choices. When they pick the word they built, spelling starts to stick. Two kids in the study even spelled new words without training. That is generative spelling from a simple matching game. Try it for five minutes at the end of your session. Track the words for a week and see if the spellings stay.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one spelling word, give the child letter tiles, let them build it, remove tiles, wait three seconds, then show three written choices and have them point to the word they built.

02At a glance

Intervention
stimulus equivalence training
Design
single case other
Sample size
6
Population
not specified
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

We studied the effects of delayed constructed-response identity matching on spelling with 6 first graders with histories of school failure. After training, the children learned to spell words to dictation and their cursive writing improved. These results replicate studies showing that delayed constructed-response matching establishes spelling. For 2 children, spelling of generalization words--words formed by recombining the syllables of training words--also improved. These results extend studies that have shown recombinative generalization in reading and spelling.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2004 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-223