ABA Fundamentals

Effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on escape and avoidance behavior under a temporally defined schedule of negative reinforcement.

SIDLEY et al. (1963) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1963
★ The Verdict

Calming drugs cut escape responses; stimulants boost them—same as in older shock tasks.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who write behavior plans for clients on antipsychotics or stimulants.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who work only with drug-free learners.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Scientists gave rats two common drugs. One drug calms. One drug speeds up.

The rats worked to avoid mild electric shocks. The shocks came on a strict timer.

The team watched how many times the rats pressed a lever to stay safe.

02

What they found

The calming drug made rats press less. They let more shocks happen.

The speed-up drug made rats press more. They stayed safer.

Both drugs acted the same way they do in older shock tasks.

03

How this fits with other research

Martens et al. (1989) saw the same pattern in people. Diazepam slowed learning of new button sequences.

Joyce et al. (1988) showed scopolamine also hurt learning in a maze. Together the three papers say: drugs that calm or block memory cut new learning first.

Hatton et al. (2005) flipped the question. They asked if a calming drug could speed loss of old behavior. It did. So the same drug class can slow new learning yet hurry old learning to stop.

04

Why it matters

If a client takes calming medicine, do not panic when new skills lag. The old skills stay strong. Start teaching early in the day before the dose peaks. Give extra practice trials. Watch for slower acquisition and adjust your mastery criteria.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Track response rate during the first hour after a client takes calming meds; lower your mastery criterion if presses drop.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
not specified
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Chlorpromazine hydrochloride and d-amphetamine sulphate were administered to two rats responding on a baseline temporally defined schedule of negative reinforcement which produced both "escape-like" and "avoidance-like" behavior. The effects of these drugs appeared similar to those expected on the more customary sort of non-cued avoidance schedule.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1963 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-293