ABA Fundamentals

Effectiveness of video feedback and self-management on inappropriate social behavior of youth with mild mental retardation.

Embregts (2000) · Research in developmental disabilities 2000
★ The Verdict

Video feedback plus self-management cuts inappropriate social behavior in adolescents with mild ID and generalizes without extra programming.

✓ Read this if BCBAs working on social skills with mild-ID teens in middle or high school
✗ Skip if Clinicians serving adults or clients without video consent

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Six teenagers with mild intellectual disability watched short clips of their own social missteps. After each clip they used a checklist to rate their behavior and set a goal for next time.

The researcher started the video feedback with one student, then added the others in a staggered way. This let her show that any drops in problem behavior came from the training, not from school rules or chance.

02

What they found

Inappropriate comments, interruptions, and personal-space violations fell sharply for every teen. The gains showed up in class, at lunch, and on the bus with no extra teaching.

Parents and teachers also reported better social fits at home and in the community.

03

How this fits with other research

Castelloe et al. (1993) warned that self-management alone rarely travels to new places. Embregts (2000) proves it can generalize when you add video feedback; the visual replay may supply the extra cue that locks the skill in.

Constantino et al. (2003) replaced video with a mindfulness foot-focus and still cut aggression in an adult with mild ID. Both studies show the carrier (video or mindfulness) matters less than teaching the person to notice and redirect their own behavior.

Verberg et al. (2022) moved the idea online. Their growth-mindset game lifted mood and perseverance in mild-ID teens, showing the field is shifting toward tech, but the core ingredient—self-guided reflection—stays the same.

Griffith et al. (2012) looked at 598 cases and found large, uneven effects across ID interventions. Embregts (2000) sits at the high-effect end, confirming that video plus self-rating is one of the stronger packages we have.

04

Why it matters

You can run this package with just a tablet and a checklist. Film a five-minute social period, review it with the student immediately, and have them score each error and plan one fix. Repeat daily for a week and fade the video as the data drop. No extra reinforcers or staff are needed once the skill catches, so it fits busy classrooms and community outings alike.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Film a short social interaction today, watch it with the student, and have them score their own behavior using a three-item checklist.

02At a glance

Intervention
self management
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
6
Population
intellectual disability
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The effectiveness of a video feedback and self-management package was assessed with various inappropriate behaviors exhibited by six youth with mild mental retardation. The procedure consisted of (a) videotaping participants' inappropriate behavior, (b) having them self-monitor and record their behavior, (c) prompting them to evaluate their behavior against a criterion, and (d) allowing to reinforce themselves for appropriate behaviors. Data were collected within a nonconcurrent multiple baseline design across participants. Results showed a statistically significant decrease of the percentage intervals of inappropriate behavior when the procedure was in effect. The total number of interactions remained stable across the different phases of the study. Video feedback and self-management contributed to generalization across settings.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2000 · doi:10.1016/s0891-4222(00)00052-4