ABA Fundamentals

Directed forgetting of elements in compound samples.

Jitsumori et al. (1992) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1992
★ The Verdict

Spatial memory is easier to erase than color memory when a cue signals irrelevance.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching conditional discriminations with compound stimuli.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with simple single-feature tasks.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team worked with four pigeons in a lab chamber.

Each trial showed two cues together: a color patch and a white line in one of four spots.

A red light meant "forget the color"; a tone meant "forget the line."

Birds then picked the matching color or the matching location, depending on the cue.

02

What they found

When told to forget color, the birds still nailed color matches.

When told to forget location, their location matches fell apart.

In plain words: spatial memory breaks easier than color memory when a cue says it no longer matters.

03

How this fits with other research

Bird et al. (2011) later showed the same birds can flip accuracy mid-delay if the payoff cue changes.

Together the two papers prove memory is not a ticking clock; it is a switch the bird can flip when conditions change.

Collier et al. (1986) saw a similar fragility: when line position moved, the discrimination crashed, but hue stayed solid.

The 1992 finding now explains why: spatial cues are simply easier to drop when the task says they are irrelevant.

04

Why it matters

You can use this when you design conditional-discrimination programs.

If a learner must ignore one part of a compound stimulus, expect location or spatial features to drop first.

Color, shape, or text cues will hang on longer, so make those the critical dimensions you want to keep.

In practice, teach the child to attend to color or shape first; spatial prompts may fade on their own once you cue irrelevance.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Put the key cue on color or shape, not left-right position, when you add a forget prompt.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
single case other
Population
other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Pigeons were trained in a delayed matching-to-sample procedure in which the sample stimuli consisted of a compound of color (red or green) and spatial location (left or right). A postsample cue (houselight on or off) signaled whether color matching or location matching would be required following the delay. In Experiment 1, the reduction in performance on probe trials (in which the houselight condition was reversed relative to that on regular trials) was greater for location matching than for color matching. The birds showed overt mediational behavior during the delays on location-matching trials. On color-matching trials, the birds exhibited behavior during delays that might have interfered with that mediational behavior. In Experiment 2, the houselight condition was changed shortly before presentation of the comparison stimuli on probe trials. Accuracy of location matching was reduced when the cue initially signaled color matching and was then changed to signal location matching, whereas matching accuracy was not reduced by a change in the opposite direction. Accuracy of color matching was reduced by a change in illumination level from dark to light, regardless of type of the relevant dimension signaled by houselight illumination. Discussion of these findings focuses on the variables critical to establishment of an effective cue to forget.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1992 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1992.58-135