CONTINUOUS OPPORTUNITY FOR REINFORCING BRAIN STIMULATION.
A single rat pressed a bar thousands of times per day for weeks because brain stimulation never lost its punch.
01Research in Context
What this study did
One rat lived in a cage with a metal bar. Every press sent a tiny pulse to a pleasure spot in its brain.
The rat could press whenever it wanted for 20 full days. No food, no water limits, no breaks.
What they found
The animal kept pressing about 29 times every minute. The pace never dropped.
There was no sign of getting tired or full of the stimulation. The behavior stayed strong for almost three weeks.
How this fits with other research
Schwartz et al. (1971) later showed you can shape the same kind of steady pressing in one hour with food instead of brain current. Their gadget did the work without a human present.
Sharp et al. (2010) pushed rates even higher by slowly asking for more presses before a reward. They reached FR 30 in only four sessions, proving high rates don’t need brain wires.
HERRNSTEISLOANE (1964) ran the opposite test the same year. Shock punishment failed to slow bar pressing in other rats. Together the two 1964 papers show powerful reinforcers beat weak punishers.
Why it matters
You will probably never wire a client’s brain, but the lesson is clear: strong reinforcers keep behavior alive. If you want a skill to stick, pick rewards the learner never gets tired of. Rotate items, let the child choose, or thin the schedule slowly. Watch for signs of satiation like slower responses or wandering eyes. When that happens, swap in a fresh reinforcer before the behavior falls apart.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Check if your client’s reinforcers are still exciting—if not, switch or spice them up before response rates drop.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The performance of a rat provided with continuous opportunity to obtain reinforcing brain stimulation over a 20-day period is described in detail. The animal averaged 29.2 responses per min during the entire time. Testing session was terminated by experimenters, but a day-by-day analysis of behavior provided no evidence that the animal would have stopped responding.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1964 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1964.7-183