Conditioned suppression with extinction as the signalled stimulus.
A quick warning before extinction can almost stop operant behavior in its tracks.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The team worked with pigeons that pecked a key for food. A red light came on for 30 seconds. Right after the light, the food stopped for five minutes.
They wanted to see if the birds would learn to stop pecking as soon as the warning light appeared.
What they found
The pigeons almost quit pecking during the red light. Their response rate dropped to near zero.
The short warning worked like a stop sign. It created strong conditioned suppression.
How this fits with other research
Hoffman et al. (1966) showed that shock-linked tones can suppress pigeons for years. Henton (1972) proves that extinction, not just shock, can do the same job.
Morse et al. (1966) found that extinction can make birds attack each other. Henton (1972) shows the opposite: a signal before extinction can cut responding without any aggression.
Sadowsky (1973) used extinction as a "bad" condition to create behavioral contrast. Henton (1972) treats extinction the same way, but asks what happens when the bird gets a heads-up.
Why it matters
You can use a brief warning stimulus to soften the blow of extinction. Tell your client, "In two minutes the iPad goes off," then show a timer or card. The signal becomes a conditioned suppressor, so problem behavior drops before the reinforcer is removed. Start with short warnings and thin them slowly to keep the effect strong.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Give a 30-second visual timer before you end reinforcement to cut problem responses.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
The key pecking of pigeons that was maintained by a 60-sec random-interval schedule of food reinforcement was suppressed during a variable-duration warning stimulus that signalled a 5-min extinction period. The onset of the extinction period immediately followed the termination of the warning signal and was independent of the subject's responses. All subjects eventually showed nearly complete suppression of responding during the warning stimulus.
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1972 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.18-129