ABA Fundamentals

Clinical evaluation of the self-injurious behavior inhibiting system (SIBIS).

Linscheid et al. (1990) · Journal of applied behavior analysis 1990
★ The Verdict

SIBIS contingent mild shock produced rapid, near-complete elimination of severe head-banging in five clients.

✓ Read this if BCBAs treating life-threatening self-injury that has failed with less intrusive methods.
✗ Skip if Practitioners in schools or agencies where contingent electric shock is prohibited.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team tested a small device called SIBIS. It gives a quick, mild shock right after a person hits their head.

Five people with severe head-banging wore the device. The study used a multiple-baseline design across participants.

02

What they found

Head-banging almost stopped the moment SIBIS turned on. The change was large and immediate.

Benefits lasted with no reported side effects.

03

How this fits with other research

Johnson et al. (1994) followed up four years later. They saw the same near-zero head-banging plus a surprise: clients smiled and laughed more after SIBIS was introduced.

Taub et al. (1994) tracked one client for six years. Head-banging stayed low even after shocks ended at 30 months. These two papers extend the 1990 finding by showing long-term maintenance and positive side effects.

van der Miesen et al. (2024) pooled newer SIB studies but did not include this 1990 paper. Their meta still backs the same idea: well-designed decelerative procedures work for severe self-injury.

Stokes et al. (1980) used a water-mist spray instead of shock. Mist also cut SIB fast, offering a less intrusive option when electric punishment is off the table.

04

Why it matters

If you face dangerous, treatment-resistant head-banging, SIBIS shows that immediate, contingent feedback can work fast. Pair the device with plans for fading and for reinforcing other skills, as later studies did. Always check agency rules, consent, and ethics boards—shock is a last-resort procedure.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Review your crisis plan—if SIB is severe and other interventions failed, gather the team to assess whether a device like SIBIS could be ethically trialed under close supervision.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
5
Finding
strongly positive
Magnitude
very large

03Original abstract

Five cases involving the treatment of longstanding, severe, and previously unmanageable self-injurious behavior are presented. In each case, the behavior was forceful contact with the head or face, and treatment consisted of mild and brief contingent electrical stimulation, delivered automatically or by a therapist, via the Self-Injurious Behavior Inhibiting System. Results of reversal and/or multiple baseline designs, in which sessions ranged in duration from 10 min to all day across a variety of settings, showed that the effects of the system were immediate and produced almost complete elimination of the self-injurious behavior. Controlled and anecdotal follow-up data for four of the five cases suggest continuing benefits and the absence of detrimental side effects associated with treatment. Potential applications of the device, as well as extensions and limitations, are discussed.

Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1990 · doi:10.1901/jaba.1990.23-53