ABA Fundamentals

Burying by rats in response to aversive and nonaversive stimuli.

Poling et al. (1981) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1981
★ The Verdict

Burying in rats is not a pure fear signal—it also shows up with harmless stimuli, so function must be tested, not assumed.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who assess stereotypy or “safety” behaviors in kids or adults.
✗ Skip if Practitioners only interested in skill-building with no problem behavior.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

The team watched rats in cages after giving them different things.

Some things hurt, like mild shocks. Some things did not hurt, like lights or sounds.

They wanted to know if rats only bury stuff when something bad happens.

02

What they found

The rats dug and pushed bedding over both scary and neutral items.

Because burying happened either way, one simple story—“burying means fear”—does not fit.

03

How this fits with other research

Koop et al. (1983) also timed rat lever presses after shocks. They found the animals waited longer when they had more time before the next shock. Both studies show timing matters, but A et al. looked at what the rat does with its paws, not how long it waits.

Corrigan et al. (1998) taught people to press a lever to avoid short bursts of CO2. Their humans only responded when the gas really came. The rat study seems to disagree—rats kept burying even when nothing bad was there. The gap is about species and response type: people stop if the cue is safe; rats may keep “tidying” anyway.

Fields et al. (1991) showed rats love cages with paper towels. Those towels are the same stuff rats later bury. Their work hints burying might be play or nesting, not just defense, which supports A et al.’s wider view.

04

Why it matters

When you see a client engage in repeated “protective” acts, think twice. The same move can serve many functions. Check what happens after the act, not just what came before. If the outcome is attention, toys, or simple sensory fun, the behavior may stay even when the threat is gone. Plan your assessment and treatment around what the behavior gets, not around the first thing that triggered it.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Run a brief reversal: remove the suspected aversive event for five trials and see if the “protective” behavior stays—if it does, look for a different payoff.

02At a glance

Intervention
not applicable
Design
other
Finding
not reported

03Original abstract

Previous investigations have shown that rats bury a variety of conditioned and unconditioned aversive stimuli. Such burying has been considered as a species-typical defensive reaction. In the present studies, rats buried spouts filled with Tabasco sauce, or condensed milk to which a taste aversion was conditioned, but did not bury water-filled spouts or spouts filled with a palatable novel food (apple juice) to which a taste aversion was not conditioned. However, in other experiments rats consistently and repeatedly buried Purina Rat Chow, Purina Rat Chow coated with quinine, and glass marbles. This indicates that a variety of stimuli, not all aversive or novel, evoke burying by rats. Whereas the behavior may reasonably be considered as a species-typical defensive behavior in some situations, the wide range of conditions that occasion burying suggests that the behavior has no single biological function.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1981 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1981.35-31