ABA Fundamentals

Avoidance responding in pigeons.

Macphail (1968) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1968
★ The Verdict

A light cue plus a hop keeps shocks away and the behavior sticks.

✓ Read this if BCBAs teaching safety or avoidance skills in clinics or schools.
✗ Skip if Clinicians working only with vocal or social behaviors.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Four pigeons learned to avoid shocks in a shuttle box.

The birds had to hop across a low wall when a light came on.

If they crossed before a timer ended, no shock came.

The study checked that the birds were truly avoiding, not just escaping.

02

What they found

Three birds hit 90% avoidance after a few short sessions.

When the shock was turned off, the hopping stopped.

This proved the birds were avoiding, not just running from pain.

The shuttle box became a standard lab tool for studying avoidance.

03

How this fits with other research

Leander et al. (1972) later got the same fast learning in rats, showing the setup works across species.

GRAF et al. (1963) and BOLLEHOFFMAN et al. (1964) had already shown pigeons can avoid shocks with lights or sounds, so the 1968 study just moved the response to hopping.

Bacon-Prue et al. (1980) and Catania et al. (1974) swapped hopping for key pecks, proving the same rules hold even when the bird only moves its head.

Together these papers build a chain: first show it works, then show it works everywhere.

04

Why it matters

If you need to teach safety skills, start with a clear signal and a simple move.

The shuttle box shows that one cue plus one quick action equals fast learning.

Use the same check: remove the threat and see if the behavior stays.

If it drops, you taught true avoidance, not just fear escape.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one safety response, add a clear visual cue, and probe with and without the hazard to confirm true avoidance.

02At a glance

Intervention
other
Design
single case other
Sample size
4
Population
neurotypical
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

Four pigeons were trained in a one-way shuttle box avoidance situation. Three of the birds met the criterion of 90% avoidances; the fourth, although frequently avoiding successfully, was too erratic to meet the criterion. Avoidance responding in two of the birds was subsequently extinguished, showing that the response was true avoidance, and not escape from the buzzer warning stimulus. In Experiment 2, the three birds that had met criterion in Experiment 1 were trained in a two-way avoidance task, and all three met the criterion of 90% avoidances. The shuttle box therefore provides a rapid and reliable method of obtaining avoidance performance in pigeons.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1968 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11-629