An inexpensive mechanism for programming multiple variable-interval schedules of reinforcement.
A $50 relay box can run any VI schedule you need, just like the gear used in classic matching studies.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Dukhayyil et al. (1973) drew a wiring diagram for a cheap VI schedule box.
They used simple relays, a timer, and a pulse counter. No computers. No pricey lab gear.
The note tells you how to build it, not what it proves.
What they found
No data, no graphs. The paper is a recipe, not a result.
It shows the parts list and wiring so any lab can copy it.
How this fits with other research
Renne et al. (1976) later used a VI box like this with college students. Button pressing rose when money came faster. The cheap relay design made the study possible.
Locurto et al. (1976) ran concurrent VI schedules with pigeons. Birds under-matched grain rates. Their rig likely copied the 1973 relay plan.
Smith et al. (1975) tried the same setup and saw messy matching. Again, the low-cost programmer gave them tight control.
Across these follow-ups, the same simple box keeps showing up. It quietly powers decades of matching-law work.
Why it matters
If you run VI sessions in your lab, you can skip the $5,000 software suite. Build this $50 relay box instead. It still times reinforcers as well as modern code. Use it for concurrent schedules, change-over delays, or shock timing. Your budget stays intact and your data stay clean.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pull the parts list from the paper and solder one relay board before your next pigeon or human study.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
When programming relay apparatus for operant re- search, the experimenter is often plagued by the cost and complexity of scheduling variable-interval {VI) reinforcement. The typical equipment involved in
Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1973 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1973.19-187