ABA Fundamentals

Abstraction of tactile properties by individuals with autism and Down syndrome using a picture‐based communication system

Belisle et al. (2019) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 2019
★ The Verdict

Plain DTT with picture cards teaches kids with autism or Down syndrome to label wet, dry, hard, soft and they will use the words on new items.

✓ Read this if BCBAs and RBTs teaching tactile language to non-speaking children.
✗ Skip if Clinicians whose clients already speak in full sentences.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Two children who used picture cards to talk learned to label how things feel. One child had autism, the other had Down syndrome.

Teachers ran short discrete-trial lessons. The kids saw an object, felt it, then touched the picture that said "wet," "dry," "hard," or "soft."

02

What they found

Both children learned the labels and used them with new objects they had never felt before. Two weeks later they still got it right.

03

How this fits with other research

Paranczak et al. (2024) and Zhirnova et al. (2025) show that typical kids can jump from simple drills to whole networks of new relations. The current study keeps the drill simple and shows it still works for kids with developmental delays who use pictures to talk.

Peterson et al. (2019) tried mixing up the model during DTT and found it slowed learning. Belisle stuck to one clear model and got clean acquisition, matching Peterson’s warning.

Bruns et al. (2004) showed that toddler’s need both listener and speaker training to categorize. Here, the picture cards acted as the speaker output, giving that missing tact step for kids who can’t talk.

04

Why it matters

If you work with non-speaking clients, you can teach abstract feel-words with plain DTT and picture cards. No need for fancy equivalence programs first. After mastery, toss in new objects to check generalization right away.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Pick one tactile property, run five-trial DTT blocks with a clear picture card, then test with a new object the same day.

02At a glance

Intervention
discrete trial training
Design
single case other
Sample size
2
Population
autism spectrum disorder, down syndrome
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The present study evaluated the efficacy of a set of procedures for bringing tact extensions of abstract tactile properties under stimulus control. Two participants with disabilities who communicated via a picture-based communication system received reinforcement for tacts of tactile properties of four wet/dry and four hard/soft stimuli. Test trials were conducted to evaluate the extent to which the participants' correct responding generalized to novel stimuli with the same tactile properties. The results suggest that the procedures were effective in bringing tact extensions of abstract tactile properties under stimulus control. Both participants' correct responding generalized to a set of novel stimuli. Mastery level responding to training and test targets maintained for 2 weeks following training. The results provide further evidence supporting the use of DTT to teach stimulus abstraction to nonvocal verbal individuals who use augmentative forms of communication.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2019 · doi:10.1002/jaba.526