Using the Performance Diagnostic Checklist-Human Services (PDC-HS) to Enhance Data Collection Procedures in Residential Treatment Settings for Clients with Significant Behavioral Challenges
A single 20-minute PDC-HS session can steer you to antecedent tweaks that push staff data accuracy past 90%.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Guercio et al. (2023) tested a 20-minute PDC-HS check in three group homes. They asked why staff data sheets were often wrong or missing.
The tool pointed to two antecedent fixes: task clarification and daily prompts. Staff got clear examples and a verbal cue at each shift start.
What they found
Data accuracy jumped from poor to 90% or better right after the fixes. The gains held across all three homes.
No extra money, prizes, or long training were needed—just clearer instructions and a quick reminder.
How this fits with other research
Wilder et al. (2018) first showed PDC-HS picks winners across all four domains. Guercio narrows the lens to one domain—data collection—and still wins big.
Merritt et al. (2019) used the same tool to cut staff tardiness with tokens plus feedback. Guercio drops the tokens and feedback, proving antecedent-only can work when the checklist says so.
Johnson et al. (1994) got similar fast, large gains with a simple supervisor checklist. The new study swaps in the PDC-HS for the checklist, giving you a data-driven way to choose what to put on that list.
Why it matters
If you run a residential program, bad data can hide client trends and waste hours of BCBA time. Run the PDC-HS once, apply its cheapest antecedent fix, and you may see clean graphs within a week. It’s a low-effort first step before you spend money on bonuses or extra training.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Pick your worst data sheet, run the PDC-HS with that shift, and roll out the indicated clarification plus daily prompt.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
ABSTRACTStaff members working in three residential homes serving persons with developmental disabilities participated in the current study. Each residence was selected based upon poor staff performances related to consistent, accurate data collection. Written daily narratives compiled by the staff on each shift were compared to designated behavioral data collection forms in each residence to determine the degree of correspondence between the two measures. The written measures were entered digitally in the intranet system that was accessed by all staff. The Performance Diagnostic Checklist- Human Services (PDC-HS) was used to assess each of the environments with respect to their data collection behavior. The PDC-HS indicated the use of antecedent based strategies with the staff in the homes in order to increase their data collection behavior. A multiple baseline design across three separate residences was employed to examine the efficacy of the identified interventions. The results demonstrated significant increases in data collection across each of the residences that participated in the study.KEYWORDS: Performance Diagnostic Checklist-Human servicestask clarificationpromptingdata collectionsevere aggression Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 2023 · doi:10.1080/01608061.2022.2159611