Mediator analysis: an overview of recent research on carers supporting people with intellectual disability and challenging behavior.
Caregiver attitudes and emotional states function as setting events—assess and address these before launching behavioral plans.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Zeiler (1999) looked at every paper that asked, "Why do some caregiver plans work and others flop?" The author pulled out factors that change how well staff-run behavior plans succeed for people with intellectual disability and challenging behavior.
The review treats caregiver mood and beliefs like setting events. If the carer is angry, scared, or sure the client is "doing it on purpose," those inner states act like loud noise or hunger do for clients—they make good responding less likely.
What they found
No single caregiver trait guarantees success, but several moderate it. Staff who feel helpless, blame the client, or get daily surges of anger need help first; otherwise even the best behavior plan stalls.
The paper frames these inner states as setting events you must assess and change before teaching replacement skills.
How this fits with other research
Hogg et al. (1995) and Shearn et al. (1997) surveyed staff earlier and found the same raw emotions—sadness, fear, anger—plus shaky ideas about why challenging behavior happens. Zeiler (1999) bundles those early facts into one map and labels them setting events.
Eisenhower et al. (2006) later tested the idea with numbers and saw mixed results: blaming thoughts did spark negative feelings, yet those feelings did not always predict how willing staff were to help. This extends D’s point—address both thoughts and feelings, because the link to actual helping is weak.
Griffith et al. (2012) added another layer. Staff who blamed the client showed more controlling, less warm styles. Again the emotion did not carry the full story; thoughts and style matter too. Together the chain looks like: attribution → emotion + style → plan success, matching D’s call to treat caregiver variables as multi-part setting events.
Why it matters
Before you write a behavior plan, take five minutes to ask the caregiver, "How do you feel when the behavior happens? Who do you think is in control of it?" If you hear high blame or burnout, teach coping, self-monitoring, or attribution reframe first. Plans stick better when the person running them feels steady and informed.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Add two questions to your caregiver interview: "What thoughts pop up when the behavior occurs?" and "How does your body feel right after?" Use answers to decide if you need pre-training on stress or attribution reframe.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Families and front-line care staff are often key agents in helping deliver behavioural interventions to people with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour. The present paper reviews factors which may impact on the effectiveness of such interventions. Both PsychLit and MedLine were used to conduct an automated literature search which included the terms 'learning disability', 'mental handicap', 'mental retardation', 'intellectual disability', 'challenging behaviour', 'families' and 'staff. This search was substantially augmented by additional citations obtained from books and journal articles. The impact of attitudes, beliefs and emotional states as setting conditions for interventions was highlighted. A variety of more general setting conditions related to intervention effectiveness were also identified. Implications for both clinical practice and future research were discussed.
Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 1999 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.1999.00209.x