The Son-Rise Program intervention for autism: prerequisites for evaluation.
Parents rarely do Son-Rise by the book, so bolt fidelity checks onto any future trial.
01Research in Context
What this study did
The author visited the families who said they were doing the Son-Rise Program.
She watched what they did, took notes, and then compared each home to the steps written in the Son-Rise manual.
No kids were tested and no scores were taken; the goal was simply to see if real-life use matched the book.
What they found
Only a few families followed the manual closely.
Most skipped parts, added their own twists, or used pieces of other therapies at the same time.
Because every house looked different, the author warned that future studies must check fidelity before claiming Son-Rise works or fails.
How this fits with other research
Scahill et al. (2015) later showed that only five of 24 autism tools are trial-ready.
Their short list—ADI-R, ADOS-2, RBS-R, CRI, BPI-01—gives you ready-made fidelity checks you can drop into a Son-Rise outcome study.
He et al. (2019) proved the RBS-R repeats the same five factors in Chinese kids, so the scale is sturdy across cultures.
Together these papers say: pick a solid ruler, then make sure parents actually run the program the same way you measure it.
Why it matters
If you plan to test Son-Rise, build a simple checklist from Lawrence’s five tools and watch parents on video.
Score each step yes/no, just like you would for any ABA protocol.
Only then can you tell if gains come from Son-Rise, from something else, or from the mix parents invent at home.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Film five minutes of a parent session and score each Son-Rise step present or absent.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
With increasing availability of interventions for children with autism, it is important that these are backed by rigorous evaluation data that have high levels of ecological validity. To achieve this, a key prerequisite for any evaluation is to gather data on typical consumers and typical implementation patterns of the intervention. This study collected such data longitudinally in relation to the Son-Rise Program, a home-based parent-run intervention for autism. Questionnaires and interview data on family demographics, implementation patterns, and perceived treatment fidelity were gathered three times over the course of a year from families who had attended a Son-Rise initial training course. Although it proved possible to produce a profile of intervention use, findings indicated that the programme is not always implemented as it is typically described in the literature. The study also highlighted methodological challenges likely to be encountered in any future evaluation of this and similar interventions for autism.
Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2006 · doi:10.1177/1362361306062012