Using a modified constant prompt-delay procedure to teach spelling to students with physical disabilities.
Constant time delay still teaches spelling when you give students with physical disabilities enough time to type or hit a switch.
01Research in Context
What this study did
Three students with physical disabilities needed to learn spelling. They could not write or speak quickly, so the team gave them extra time.
The teacher used constant time delay: show the word, wait, then give the answer if the student did not type it. The wait started at zero seconds and grew to five seconds. Students typed on keyboards or hit switches.
What they found
All three students learned to spell the target words. They kept the words after the prompts were gone. The longer response window let them hit the keys without rushing.
How this fits with other research
Jones et al. (1992) already showed that constant time delay works for quick hand-raising or pointing. Beth et al. simply stretched the delay so slow movements still count.
Lancioni et al. (2008) later swapped the human prompt for an automatic air cue with adults. Both studies keep the fade-the-help idea, but one uses people and the other uses machines.
Gwynette et al. (2020) tweaked Direct Instruction for kids who use speech tablets. Like Beth et al., they prove you can keep the teaching method if you let the learner answer in their own way and time.
Why it matters
If a student needs switches, eye-gaze, or extra seconds, you can still use constant time delay. Keep the prompt, stretch the wait, and watch the learner type the right answer. Try it next session: give five full seconds before you deliver the cue.
Want CEUs on This Topic?
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.
Join Free →Set your prompt delay to five seconds and wait the full time before giving the cue; let the learner finish typing.
02At a glance
03Original abstract
Current research suggests that constant delay is an effective means of teaching students through near-errorless learning. The current study examined how procedures used in previous research may be modified so that constant delay can be implemented with students who have physical disabilities that prevent them from engaging in fluent academic responding. A multiple baseline design with probes was used to assess the effectiveness of a modified constant-delay procedure in teaching spelling to students with physical disabilities. This procedure was found to be effective for all 3 students.
Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2004 · doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-469