ABA Fundamentals

Titration schedule with rats in a restraining device.

Dallemagne et al. (1970) · Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior 1970
★ The Verdict

Rats quickly learn to hold shock at a low, steady level and stop the moment shock ends.

✓ Read this if BCBAs who study avoidance or negative reinforcement in lab or clinical settings.
✗ Skip if Practitioners looking for direct child-intervention protocols.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Scientists put rats in a small tube. Each rat could press a lever to lower mild electric shock.

The shock crept back up every few seconds. Pressing again knocked it down. This loop is called a titration schedule.

02

What they found

The rats quickly learned to keep the shock at a low, steady level. Their lever pressing stayed stable for long sessions.

When the researchers turned the shock off, pressing stopped at once. The behavior extinguished immediately.

03

How this fits with other research

Rachlin (1972) repeated the idea with pigeons and rats and saw the same stable response rate. The two studies back each other up across species.

Mosk et al. (1984) later showed that stable avoidance only works above a minimum shock intensity. G et al. found steady low-shock performance, while D et al. revealed the floor below which the behavior collapses.

WALLETHOMAS et al. (1963) had already shown that shorter reset intervals let monkeys and humans tolerate more shock. G et al. built on those rules to design the rat lever setup.

04

Why it matters

The study shows that organisms will work just hard enough to keep aversive events bearable. When the aversive event disappears, the work stops. For BCBAs, this is a reminder to fade or remove aversive components as soon as possible. If you use any form of negative reinforcement, build in clear removal cues and plan for rapid extinction once the aversive is gone.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Check that any negative reinforcement you use has a clear removal cue and an exit plan.

02At a glance

Intervention
extinction
Design
single case other
Population
not specified
Finding
positive
Magnitude
large

03Original abstract

In a restraining device, providing a constant localization and easy placement of stimulating electrodes, rats were conditioned to push a front panel in order to reduce the intensity of a shock which otherwise increased regularly every 10 sec. Rapid conditioning was obtained from all subjects. They showed a very stable behavior, with negligible inter- or intra-individual variability throughout very long experimental sessions. The operant nature of the response was demonstrated further in extinction, where no shock was delivered, and in situations where the animal could not change the predetermined intensity of the shock. The interpretation of the obtained threshold was discussed with reference to previous studies on titration schedule. It was suggested that, with the parameters used, the shock intensity at which it was maintained by the rats' behavior, had the value of a warning signal, and that, in this particular case, the titration schedule generated mainly discriminative avoidance behavior rather than escape behavior.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 1970 · doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-339