ABA Fundamentals

Assisting persons with multiple disabilities to move through simple occupational activities with automatic prompting.

Lancioni et al. (2008) · Research in developmental disabilities 2008
★ The Verdict

Automatic air puffs or short voice cues can guide adults with vision and hearing loss through multi-step work jobs without a staff member present.

✓ Read this if BCBAs running adult day programs or vocational crews for clients with multiple disabilities.
✗ Skip if Clinicians who work only with young children or clients without sensory impairments.

01Research in Context

01

What this study did

Lancioni et al. (2008) worked with four adults who had both vision and hearing loss. Each adult had to finish three-step jobs like putting folders into a box. The team set up two machines: one blew a puff of air on the hand and one played a short voice cue. The machines fired by themselves when the person stopped moving for too long.

The study used a multiple-baseline design across participants. Prompts were automatic; no staff had to stand nearby.

02

What they found

All four adults learned to move through the jobs after the automatic prompts. When the team later doubled the task list from three to six steps, the adults still kept working without extra help. Skills stayed high after the machines were removed.

03

How this fits with other research

Coleman-Martin et al. (2004) also used prompting to teach new skills, but they needed a staff member to wait and deliver each cue. E et al. swapped the human for a sensor and still got good results. The new method removes the need for a partner.

Ozen et al. (2022) taught preschoolers to fasten snaps and buttons with two live prompting styles. Both worked, yet an adult had to give every cue. E et al. shows that machines can take over once learners are older and tasks are vocational.

Kobylarz et al. (2020) taught vocational tasks to adults with developmental disabilities too, but they used backward chaining with staff guidance. E et al. proves you can replace that guidance with automatic air or voice prompts and still see success.

04

Why it matters

If you serve adults with dual sensory loss, you can set up cheap sensors or voice players to keep them moving through work tasks. You free up staff time while the learner gains independence. Try adding an automatic prompt the next time someone stalls mid-sequence; fade it once the flow feels natural.

Free CEUs

Want CEUs on This Topic?

The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ free CEUs — live every Wednesday. Ethics, supervision & clinical topics.

Join Free →
→ Action — try this Monday

Tape a small Bluetooth speaker near the task table and record a 2-second cue like “Next folder”; set it to play if the client pauses longer than 10 seconds.

02At a glance

Intervention
prompting and fading
Design
multiple baseline across participants
Sample size
4
Population
mixed clinical
Finding
positive

03Original abstract

The present study assessed the possibility of assisting four persons with multiple disabilities to move through and perform simple occupational activities arranged within a room with the help of automatic prompting. The study involved two multiple probe designs across participants. The first multiple probe concerned the two participants with blindness or minimal vision and deafness, who received air blowing as a prompt. The second multiple probe concerned the two participants with blindness and typical hearing who received a voice calling as a prompt. Initially, all participants had baseline sessions. Then intervention started with the first participant of each dyad. When their performance was consolidated, new baseline and intervention occurred with the second participant of each dyad. Finally, all four participants were exposed to a second intervention phase, in which the number of activities per session doubled (i.e., from 8 to 16). Data showed that all four participants: (a) learned to move across and perform the activities available with the help of automatic prompting and (b) remained highly successful through the second intervention phase when the sessions were extended. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Research in developmental disabilities, 2008 · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2007.08.002