By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
Professional organizations like ABAI and APBA provide essential coordination and resources for advocacy, but they cannot do the work alone. Legislators and regulators are most influenced by their own constituents, which means that individual behavior analysts communicating with their local representatives carry significant weight. Professional organizations also have limited capacity to monitor and respond to every state-level development simultaneously. When individual practitioners engage in advocacy, they multiply the profession's voice, provide local knowledge that national organizations lack, and build relationships with decision-makers that can be activated quickly when urgent issues arise.
Effective advocacy does not require a large time commitment, especially when starting out. Many impactful activities take minutes rather than hours: calling a legislator, signing a petition, sharing accurate information about behavior analysis on social media, or forwarding a state association's advocacy alert to colleagues. For those who want to contribute more, attending one legislative hearing per session or joining an advocacy committee meeting once a month can make a meaningful difference. Employers who understand that advocacy protects the sustainability of their business model may also support time allocation for advocacy activities.
Several issues demand attention across most jurisdictions. Insurance companies continue to impose barriers to service access through restrictive prior authorization requirements, inadequate reimbursement rates, and narrow medical necessity criteria. Scope of practice challenges from other professions threaten behavior analysts' ability to practice independently. Workforce shortages limit service availability, especially in rural and underserved areas. Medicaid coverage and funding adequacy for ABA services remain inconsistent across states. Additionally, the profession faces ongoing public perception challenges that affect its credibility with legislators and regulators. Each of these issues requires organized, sustained advocacy.
Historical context provides essential lessons for current advocacy efforts. Understanding how previous licensure battles were won, what strategies led to insurance mandates, and how the profession responded to past challenges provides a playbook for addressing current issues. History also reveals patterns: legislative gains that seemed permanent have been eroded when advocacy efforts relaxed, and professions that failed to organize effectively lost ground to better-organized competitors. As Christine Evanko emphasizes, knowing where the profession has been helps behavior analysts understand where it is headed and what they need to do to shape that trajectory.
While the BACB Ethics Code does not mandate specific advocacy activities, several ethical principles support engagement. Code 1.01 directs behavior analysts to actively promote client well-being, which can be interpreted to include advocating for systemic conditions that enable effective service delivery. Code 6.01 addresses promoting an ethical culture within the profession. Code 1.04 requires integrity in all professional activities, which applies to advocacy communications. Behavior analysts who remain silent while policies undermine client access to services may be failing to meet the spirit of these ethical obligations, even if they are technically compliant.
Authentic collaboration with the disability community requires humility, listening, and a willingness to share power. Behavior analysts should seek out autistic self-advocates and disability rights organizations as partners rather than positioning themselves as the sole voice on issues that affect disabled individuals. This means attending events organized by the disability community, inviting self-advocates to co-present at legislative hearings, incorporating lived experience into advocacy messaging, and being willing to modify professional positions when they conflict with the expressed needs and preferences of the community. Coalition advocacy that centers the voices of those most affected is both more ethical and more effective.
Preparation is key to an effective legislative meeting. Know the specific bill or issue you want to discuss and have a clear, concise ask, ideally one sentence. Research the legislator's background, committee assignments, and previous positions on related issues. Prepare a brief explanation of behavior analysis that avoids jargon. Bring a personal story or concrete example that illustrates why the issue matters to their constituents. Be prepared to answer questions honestly, including saying that you do not know an answer and will follow up. Leave behind a one-page summary of your position with your contact information. Follow up with a thank-you note within a week.
Addressing misconceptions requires acknowledging concerns honestly rather than dismissing them. Many criticisms of ABA are rooted in real experiences with outdated or poorly implemented practices, and defensive responses only reinforce negative perceptions. Effective public advocacy involves clearly articulating what modern, ethical ABA practice looks like, providing concrete examples of client-centered approaches, acknowledging the profession's historical mistakes and the steps being taken to address them, and highlighting outcomes that matter to families and communities. Sharing parent and client testimonials, with appropriate consent, can be particularly powerful in countering abstract misconceptions.
State associations serve as the primary organized advocacy voice for behavior analysis at the state level. They typically monitor legislative and regulatory developments, coordinate responses to threats and opportunities, maintain relationships with legislators, organize testimony for committee hearings, and provide advocacy training for members. Many state associations have legislative committees that can provide entry points for practitioners who want to get involved. Joining and actively participating in your state association is one of the most efficient ways to contribute to advocacy, as it allows you to leverage the organization's infrastructure and relationships rather than starting from scratch.
Measuring advocacy impact requires identifying clear outcomes and tracking progress over time. Specific metrics might include the number of bills passed or defeated that affect behavior analysis, changes in insurance authorization policies, increases in Medicaid reimbursement rates, or expansion of scope of practice provisions. Process measures such as the number of legislative contacts made, the growth of advocacy committee participation, and media coverage of behavior analysis issues can also provide indicators of progress. Just as clinical practice requires ongoing data collection and analysis, effective advocacy requires monitoring outcomes and adjusting strategies based on results.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
You Gotta Fight for Your Right... to Advocate for Behavior Analysis — Christine Evanko · 1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $15
Take This Course →1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $15 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.