By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
Tension between BCBAs and SLPs typically stems from overlapping scopes of practice, differing theoretical frameworks, and mutual misconceptions. Both disciplines address communication, but they approach it from different perspectives. Behavior analysts focus on the functional relationship between communicative behavior and its consequences, while SLPs focus on the developmental and linguistic foundations of communication. These different approaches can produce competing recommendations for the same client. Misconceptions compound the problem: behavior analysts may view SLP approaches as lacking empirical rigor, while SLPs may view ABA approaches as overly rigid or insufficiently attentive to language development. Professional training in both fields typically includes limited exposure to the other discipline, which perpetuates these misunderstandings. Resolving tension requires deliberate effort to understand each other's perspectives, establish communication, and focus on shared client goals.
Translating behavior analytic terminology requires identifying the functional concept behind the technical term and expressing it in language that is accessible to professionals from other disciplines. A mand can be described as a request or a communicative act that gets the person what they want. A tact can be described as labeling or commenting on things in the environment. An intraverbal can be described as a conversational response or answering questions. Discriminative stimuli can be described as cues or signals. Reinforcement contingencies can be described as the consequences that follow communication and make it more likely to happen again. The goal is not to eliminate precision but to communicate the same concept in a way that supports mutual understanding. Using both terms together, such as stating that you are working on mands or requests, can help SLP colleagues learn behavioral terminology while maintaining accessibility.
When disagreements arise, BCBAs should approach the situation collaboratively rather than adversarially. First, seek to understand the SLP's reasoning by asking questions about the evidence and clinical rationale supporting their recommendation. Second, share your own perspective clearly, explaining the behavioral evidence and clinical reasoning behind your position. Third, identify areas of agreement and build on them. Fourth, if the disagreement cannot be resolved through direct discussion, consider consulting with additional experts or proposing a data-based trial of each approach. Fifth, remember that the resolution should be guided by the client's best interest under Code 3.01, not by disciplinary loyalty. In some cases, deferring to the SLP's expertise in areas that fall primarily within their scope, such as AAC device selection or phonological assessment, is the most appropriate ethical and clinical decision.
Effective AAC coordination requires clearly defined roles, shared goals, and regular communication. A common model assigns the SLP primary responsibility for AAC assessment, device selection, vocabulary programming, and language-based intervention strategies, while the behavior analyst takes primary responsibility for teaching functional use of the AAC system through systematic instruction, reinforcement contingencies, and generalization programming. Both professionals should participate in collaborative goal-setting to ensure that AAC goals are clinically appropriate, developmentally informed, and functionally meaningful. Regular joint meetings allow both professionals to review client progress data, discuss what is working, and adjust the intervention as needed. Families should be included in these discussions and should receive consistent recommendations from both providers about how to support AAC use at home.
The BACB Ethics Code (2022) establishes several obligations relevant to interprofessional collaboration. Code 2.10 requires behavior analysts to work cooperatively with other professionals, share relevant information, and coordinate services to benefit the client. Code 2.01 requires practicing within boundaries of competence, which may necessitate consulting with SLPs when communication goals extend beyond behavioral expertise. Code 2.12 requires promoting an ethical culture, which includes fostering respectful interprofessional dynamics. Code 3.01 requires acting in the client's best interest, which in collaborative settings means prioritizing service coordination over disciplinary preferences. Code 1.06 addresses the use of terminology, implying that behavior analysts should communicate in ways that are accessible to interprofessional audiences. Together, these standards establish that effective collaboration is not optional but a binding ethical obligation.
BCBAs can build SLP literacy through several strategies. Attending interprofessional continuing education events that feature both ABA and SLP perspectives provides exposure to SLP approaches within a familiar educational format. Reading introductory SLP literature on topics relevant to shared clients, such as AAC, language development, and pragmatic language intervention, builds foundational knowledge. Asking SLP colleagues to explain their assessment findings, treatment rationale, and clinical reasoning during team meetings or informal conversations demonstrates respect and creates learning opportunities. Observing SLP sessions with appropriate permissions provides direct exposure to clinical practices. Some universities offer interdisciplinary courses or clinical experiences that bring ABA and SLP students together. These investments in cross-disciplinary learning pay dividends in improved collaboration, better client outcomes, and more satisfying professional relationships.
Common misconceptions include the beliefs that SLP approaches are not evidence-based, that SLPs focus only on speech production rather than functional communication, that SLP interventions are purely developmental and ignore environmental variables, and that SLPs lack training in systematic instruction. In reality, SLP is an evidence-based profession with a substantial research base supporting its clinical practices. Modern SLP approaches address functional communication broadly, including AAC systems for individuals who do not use speech. Many SLP interventions incorporate environmental modifications and reinforcement principles, even if they are not described in behavior analytic terminology. SLPs receive training in structured therapy approaches that share principles with behavioral instruction. Correcting these misconceptions requires direct engagement with SLP colleagues and their literature rather than reliance on secondhand characterizations.
Interprofessional communication goals should be documented in a format that is accessible to all team members and the family. Shared goals should describe the target behavior in terms that both disciplines understand, specify the conditions under which the behavior is expected, and define the criteria for mastery. Rather than using exclusively behavioral or exclusively linguistic terminology, shared documentation should use functional language that conveys the clinical intent clearly. For example, a shared goal might state that the client will use their AAC device to request preferred items across three settings with at least eighty percent independence. This language conveys the target, the modality, the generalization expectation, and the mastery criterion without requiring specialized terminology from either discipline. Both the behavior analyst's and the SLP's specific intervention strategies can be documented separately while referencing this shared goal.
Families should be informed participants in interprofessional collaboration, not passive recipients of professional recommendations. Under Code 2.15, families have the right to understand the roles of each professional on their child's team, how services will be coordinated, and how disagreements will be resolved. In practice, families often serve as the primary link between ABA and SLP services, carrying information between providers and implementing recommendations from both. This role can be burdensome when recommendations are contradictory or when families are expected to mediate professional disagreements. BCBAs should actively work to reduce this burden by establishing direct professional communication channels, coordinating recommendations before sharing them with families, and presenting a unified treatment approach whenever possible.
BCBA training programs can incorporate interprofessional collaboration through several approaches. Didactic coursework should include content on interprofessional dynamics, communication strategies, and the scope and practices of related disciplines including SLP. Clinical practica should include opportunities to collaborate with SLP students or professionals on shared cases, providing supervised experience in interprofessional communication and coordination. Guest lectures from SLP professionals can provide firsthand exposure to another discipline's perspective. Case study exercises that require students to integrate ABA and SLP perspectives in treatment planning build the analytical skills needed for collaboration. Role-playing exercises that simulate interprofessional team meetings or conflict resolution scenarios build practical communication skills. These training investments produce BCBAs who enter the workforce prepared to collaborate effectively rather than learning through trial and error.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Working Relationships Aba And Slp — CASP CEU Center · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $
Take This Course →1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $ · CASP CEU Center
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.