By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
The most frequent mistakes include submitting treatment plans that lack required elements such as specific measurable objectives tied to assessment findings, missing reauthorization deadlines which results in service gaps, failing to document medical necessity in the specific language TRICARE reviewers expect, and not maintaining adequate session notes that reflect the services billed. Another common error is recommending service hours without sufficient assessment data to justify the intensity. Each of these mistakes can lead to authorization denials, delayed services, or recoupment of payments, all of which directly affect the families you serve. Additionally, failure to involve the family in progress monitoring and reauthorization planning can result in families being surprised by service changes they did not anticipate. Proactive communication with families about the reauthorization timeline and what data are being submitted builds trust and reduces the stress that authorization uncertainty creates.
First, review whether your authorization request included all required supporting documentation and whether the clinical justification was clearly articulated. If the documentation was complete, file a formal appeal through the appropriate TRICARE process, including additional data or clarification that supports your recommendation. While the appeal is pending, adjust your treatment plan to maximize the effectiveness of the authorized hours, focusing on the highest-priority targets. Communicate transparently with the family about the situation and their options. Document both your original recommendation and the rationale for the adjusted plan, maintaining ethical standards under Code 2.01. During the appeal process, continue providing the most effective services possible within the authorized hours. Prioritize the highest-impact targets and consider whether supplementary parent training or environmental modifications can partially compensate for the reduced service intensity while the appeal is pending.
Your obligation under Code 2.14 is to act in the client's best interest during transitions and service termination. If your data support continued services, clearly document the clinical rationale and submit it through the appropriate review process. Simultaneously, prepare a transition plan that ensures the client is not left without support if TRICARE-funded services end. This may include connecting the family with other resources, providing parent training to maintain gains, and preparing comprehensive documentation for any future provider. Never misrepresent data to extend authorization, but advocate firmly based on honest clinical findings. If TRICARE coverage ends and you believe services are still needed, help the family explore all available options including Medicaid waiver programs, state-funded services, school-based ABA, and community resources. Your obligation to the client's wellbeing extends beyond the boundaries of a single funding source.
Begin transition planning at least 90 days before the anticipated move if possible. Prepare a comprehensive transfer package including current assessment data, treatment plan, progress on all targets, preference assessments, and information about effective strategies and known challenges. Research ABA providers in the gaining location and, with the family's consent, initiate contact to facilitate a warm handoff. Help the family understand what steps they need to take with TRICARE to establish services at the new location. Provide parent training on maintaining key programs during any service gap. Code 2.14 requires responsible transition planning, and for military families, this planning should be treated as a routine component of service delivery. If direct provider-to-provider communication is not possible, prepare a detailed written summary that stands alone as a clinical resource for any qualified behavior analyst who might receive the case. Include information about what has been tried and what results were observed, not just current programming details.
Yes, you can ethically provide services at a reduced intensity while advocating for the appropriate level through appeals. However, you must be transparent with the family about the discrepancy between your clinical recommendation and the authorized level, adjust your treatment plan to be realistic given the available hours, and document both your original recommendation and the modified plan. What would be unethical is silently accepting an inadequate authorization without informing the family or attempting to secure appropriate service levels. The family has a right to understand the situation and participate in decisions about how to proceed. Be transparent with the family about the potential impact of reduced hours on their child's progress, including realistic expectations for what can be achieved within the authorized service level. Families who understand the situation can make informed decisions about whether to supplement TRICARE-funded services with additional resources if available.
Collect and graph data continuously so that your progress reporting reflects current performance rather than rushed end-of-period summaries. Structure your session notes to clearly connect each session's activities to treatment plan objectives. Use TRICARE-specific language for medical necessity in your reports, linking behavioral targets to functional outcomes. Maintain a reauthorization calendar with submission deadlines built in at least two weeks early. Include both quantitative data and qualitative descriptions of progress in context. Address any targets where progress is below expectations proactively, explaining the clinical rationale for continued intervention rather than leaving reviewers to draw their own conclusions. Consider creating a reauthorization preparation checklist that you review at least two weeks before each submission deadline. This systematic approach ensures that nothing is overlooked during the often time-pressured reauthorization process and produces higher-quality submissions that are more likely to be approved without additional review.
The core ethical principles are the same: bill accurately for services rendered, do not upcode, and do not bill for services that are not medically necessary. However, TRICARE is a federal program, which means that billing fraud carries additional legal consequences under the False Claims Act. The scrutiny of billing patterns may also be more rigorous. Behavior analysts should maintain meticulous records of service delivery times, ensure that billed codes accurately reflect the services provided, and never adjust clinical practices solely to optimize billing. Code 2.10 requires accurate documentation regardless of the payer, but the federal implications of TRICARE billing errors add urgency to this obligation. If you become aware of significant discrepancies between your billing practices and TRICARE requirements, seek guidance from your compliance officer or an external billing consultant immediately rather than attempting to resolve the issue independently. Early intervention in billing compliance issues prevents small errors from becoming significant problems.
During informed consent, explain the TRICARE ACD program structure including authorization processes, potential hour limitations, reauthorization requirements, and discharge criteria. Inform families that service intensity may be subject to TRICARE review and may not always match your clinical recommendation. Discuss the appeals process and their role in it. Explain what happens during service transitions and what supports are available if TRICARE-funded services are interrupted. This transparency satisfies Code 2.11 requirements for informed consent and empowers families to be active participants in navigating the TRICARE system. Document that this information was provided and discussed. Consider providing families with a written summary of the TRICARE ABA coverage structure in addition to the verbal explanation during the consent discussion. Written materials allow families to review the information at their own pace and share it with other family members who may be involved in treatment decisions.
Administrative burden is a real challenge but does not reduce your ethical obligations. Develop efficient systems for documentation, authorization submissions, and progress reporting that minimize time spent on administrative tasks without compromising quality. Consider whether your organization needs additional administrative support to handle TRICARE-specific requirements. Set realistic caseload limits that allow you to meet both clinical and administrative demands adequately. If you find that TRICARE administrative requirements are preventing you from providing adequate clinical supervision or direct services, this is a competence issue under Code 1.05 that must be addressed rather than ignored. If you find that administrative demands are consistently exceeding available time despite efficient systems, document this impact and present it to your organization as a staffing or process issue that requires organizational-level solutions rather than continuing to absorb the burden individually.
Code 1.04 addresses integrity, and Code 1.06 addresses responding to non-behavioral treatment. If you have evidence that a colleague is engaging in fraudulent billing or misrepresenting services to TRICARE, you have an ethical obligation to address the situation. Start by discussing your concerns directly with the colleague if doing so is appropriate and safe. If the behavior continues or is serious enough to warrant immediate action, report it to the appropriate authority within your organization. For TRICARE-specific fraud, reporting to the TRICARE program integrity office may be necessary. Document your observations and actions. Protecting federal program integrity and the families who depend on it is both an ethical and legal obligation. If appropriate, consult with your organization's compliance officer or legal counsel about the proper reporting channels and the protections available to you as a reporter. Understanding the reporting process before you need to use it ensures that you can act decisively when the situation requires it.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Tricare Policy An Ethical And Solution Focused Discussion — CASP CEU Center · 1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $
Take This Course →1 BACB Ethics CEUs · $ · CASP CEU Center
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.