By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
The strongest evidence supports telehealth delivery for caregiver training and coaching, BCBA consultation, naturalistic teaching support in the home environment, and functional communication training where the caregiver can serve as the implementing agent. Remote supervision of RBTs via telehealth also has meaningful evidence support when implemented within BACB guidelines. Services that require direct physical prompting, proximal observation of subtle behavioral indicators not visible on video, or crisis management that exceeds caregiver implementation capacity are less appropriate for telehealth delivery. Individual client factors — technology access, caregiver capacity, treatment goal type — should drive the clinical decision for each case.
The BACB specifies that telehealth supervision can count toward required RBT supervision hours under specific conditions: the BCBA must be able to observe the RBT delivering services in real time (not just after the fact via recording), the technology must enable adequate behavioral observation, and the supervision must meet all other BACB supervision requirements. Documentation should specify that supervision was conducted via telehealth and confirm that real-time observation occurred. BCBAs should consult the current BACB Supervision Requirements document for the most current guidance, as specific requirements may be updated.
Telehealth billing requires payer-specific, current knowledge — there is no universal answer. At minimum, BCBAs should know which service codes each payer covers via telehealth, what place-of-service codes apply (typically POS 10 for telehealth in the patient's home or POS 02 for other telehealth, but this varies), what documentation requirements are specific to telehealth claims, and what modifier codes are required. Many payers require the GT modifier for telehealth claims; others have payer-specific modifiers. Organizations should maintain written, dated documentation of each payer's current telehealth policy and update it at contract renewals and when policy changes are announced.
Telehealth consent should include: a description of the telehealth modality and how it differs from in-person services; the technology requirements and any associated costs borne by the client; the limitations of telehealth service delivery including what would trigger transition to in-person services; privacy protections specific to video-based delivery including the platform used and its HIPAA compliance status; the right to decline telehealth and receive in-person services where available; and, for caregiver-implemented models, the caregiver's specific role and responsibilities during telehealth sessions. Documented consent that covers these elements protects the organization in the event of a complaint and ensures families are making genuinely informed decisions about service modality.
Telehealth session notes typically require additional documentation elements beyond standard in-person notes. Required elements commonly include: identification of the service as telehealth and the modality used (synchronous video, etc.); the location of the provider at the time of service; the location of the client or patient at the time of service; documentation that the client or caregiver consented to the telehealth format for that session; and the technology platform used. Missing these elements from a telehealth note is a common cause of denial even when the clinical content is adequate. Using a telehealth-specific note template that includes prompts for these required elements substantially reduces documentation errors.
Crisis management via telehealth requires explicit advance planning. Before initiating telehealth services with any client who has a history of severe challenging behavior, the BCBA should develop a written crisis protocol specific to the telehealth context. This protocol should specify: the caregiver's immediate response steps if the client engages in crisis behavior during a session; the criteria for ending the telehealth session immediately; how the BCBA will remain in contact during and after the incident; what follow-up documentation is required; and under what conditions subsequent sessions will revert to in-person rather than telehealth delivery. Improvising crisis management during an active telehealth crisis is inadequate — the protocol must exist before crisis occurs.
All telehealth platforms used for clinical services must be HIPAA-compliant, which requires a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA) between the organization and the platform vendor. Consumer-grade video platforms (FaceTime, standard Zoom without a BAA, WhatsApp) do not meet HIPAA standards for telehealth clinical sessions involving protected health information. The platform must implement appropriate technical safeguards including encryption. During sessions, providers must ensure that their location provides visual and audio privacy — conducting telehealth sessions in shared workspaces where PHI may be heard or seen by unauthorized individuals violates HIPAA. Organizations should document their platform's HIPAA compliance status and conduct periodic reviews as platform features and policies change.
Telehealth caregiver training for families new to ABA requires a more intensive onboarding sequence than would typically be needed for families with prior ABA experience. Before relying on caregiver implementation during telehealth sessions, the BCBA should verify that the caregiver can accurately describe the target procedure, demonstrate it during a role-play observable via video, and apply it correctly with the client in at least one supervised session with real-time feedback. Attempting to coach a caregiver to implement a procedure they have not yet acquired through this sequence places the clinical outcome entirely on the quality of in-session verbal coaching, which is less reliable than a structured training sequence.
Telehealth access is not uniformly distributed. Families with limited internet access, shared or inadequate devices, small living spaces with limited privacy, language barriers with the telehealth platform, or caregivers with limited capacity to actively facilitate sessions face structural disadvantages in telehealth service models. Organizations that implement telehealth-first service models without assessing and addressing these equity factors effectively shift service access barriers onto the families who already face the most systemic disadvantage. Equity-conscious telehealth design includes assessing technology access as part of intake, providing technology support resources where possible, maintaining in-person service options for families for whom telehealth creates significant access barriers, and avoiding policies that de facto restrict in-person services to cases the organization finds administratively inconvenient.
Telehealth billing policy changes most commonly occur through three channels: state Medicaid policy updates, commercial payer contract amendments, and state-level legislative or regulatory actions. Organizations should assign a specific staff member to monitor each of these channels — tracking state Medicaid bulletin publications, reviewing payer communications at contract renewal and throughout the year, and monitoring state legislature activity on telehealth parity or coverage legislation. Membership in state ABA provider associations is a practical source of policy update information. When policy changes are identified, the impact on current telehealth claims should be assessed immediately and documentation templates and billing procedures updated before any transition date.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Telehealth Tuesday May 19 2020 — CASP CEU Center · 1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $
Take This Course →1 BACB Supervision CEUs · $ · CASP CEU Center
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.