By Matt Harrington, BCBA · Behaviorist Book Club · Research-backed answers for behavior analysts
While specific laws vary by state, most jurisdictions permit restraint only when there is imminent danger of physical harm to the student or others that cannot be managed through less restrictive means. Restraint should not be used as a consequence for misbehavior, as a means of compliance, or for the convenience of staff. Most states also prohibit certain types of restraint, particularly prone restraint, and require that staff implementing restraint have received specific training. Always consult the laws in your particular state, as requirements differ significantly.
Restraint involves restricting a student's freedom of movement through direct physical contact by one or more adults. Seclusion involves placing a student in an enclosed area from which they are physically prevented from leaving. Most state laws regulate both but may define them differently. Some states have banned seclusion entirely while still permitting restraint under specific conditions. Mechanical restraint, the use of devices to restrict movement, is generally prohibited in school settings. Chemical restraint, the use of medication, is addressed under separate medical and educational regulations.
Most states require documentation that includes the date, time, and duration of the event; the name of the student and staff involved; the behavior that precipitated the use of restraint or seclusion; the less restrictive interventions attempted before the procedure; a description of the restraint or seclusion method used; the student's behavior during the procedure; any injuries sustained by the student or staff; and the notification provided to parents. Many states also require that this documentation be completed within a specified timeframe, often within 24 hours.
Training should cover the legal requirements governing restraint and seclusion in your state, the ethical principles that guide their use, recognition of crisis escalation patterns, de-escalation techniques specific to common student behavioral profiles, the physical techniques for safe restraint implementation, the decision-making criteria for when restraint or seclusion is appropriate, documentation requirements, and debriefing procedures. Training should include practice components and competency assessments, not just lectures. Refresher training should occur at regular intervals as required by law and best practice.
Document your observations and concerns in writing. Discuss the situation with the staff involved, focusing on the specific behaviors you observed and the legal and ethical requirements that were not met. Provide additional training if the issue stems from a knowledge gap. If the issue persists, escalate to school administration with a written summary of your concerns, the applicable legal requirements, and specific recommendations for corrective action. If you believe a student's safety is at risk, consider whether a report to the appropriate oversight body is warranted.
The Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts applies to behavior analysts regardless of their employment setting. When school district policy is more restrictive than the ethics code, the behavior analyst follows the more restrictive standard. When the ethics code is more restrictive than district policy, the behavior analyst follows the ethics code. If a district policy permits practices that the behavior analyst believes are inconsistent with professional ethics, the behavior analyst has an obligation to advocate for change while complying with the ethical standards of the profession.
If there is an anticipation that restraint or seclusion may be needed based on the student's behavioral history, it should be addressed in the behavior intervention plan. The BIP should specify the conditions under which these procedures may be used, the specific methods that are authorized, who is trained and authorized to implement them, and the prevention strategies that should be in place to reduce the need for crisis intervention. Including this information in the BIP ensures that all team members are aware of the plan and that parents have been informed and have consented.
A structured debriefing should occur within 24 hours and include the behavior analyst, the staff involved in the incident, and the student's case manager or team lead. The debriefing reviews what happened before the crisis, what de-escalation strategies were attempted, the decision-making process that led to restraint, how the restraint was implemented, any concerns about the implementation, and what changes to the prevention plan might prevent a recurrence. The debriefing should result in documented action steps with assigned responsibilities and follow-up dates.
Focus on strengthening the prevention systems. Ensure that every student with crisis behavior has a thorough functional behavior assessment and a behavior intervention plan with robust antecedent strategies. Train all staff on de-escalation techniques and verify that they are being implemented consistently. Analyze restraint data to identify environmental patterns, such as specific times of day, settings, or transitions that are associated with higher rates of crisis behavior, and address those patterns through environmental modification. Advocate for adequate staffing and training resources.
Physical risks include injury to the student and staff, with documented cases of serious harm and even death associated with restraint, particularly prone restraint. Psychological risks include trauma, increased anxiety about the school environment, and damage to the student-staff relationship. Behavioral risks include inadvertent reinforcement of crisis behavior if restraint produces escape from demands, and the development of more intense crisis behavior as the student escalates to overcome the restraint. Organizational risks include legal liability, parental complaints, and regulatory scrutiny.
The ABA Clubhouse has 60+ on-demand CEUs including ethics, supervision, and clinical topics like this one. Plus a new live CEU every Wednesday.
Ready to go deeper? This course covers this topic with structured learning objectives and CEU credit.
Ethical and Legal Considerations on the use of Seclusion and Restraint — John Molteni · 1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $25
Take This Course →1.5 BACB Ethics CEUs · $25 · BehaviorLive
Research-backed educational guide with practice recommendations
Side-by-side comparison with clinical decision framework
All behavior-analytic intervention is individualized. The information on this page is for educational purposes and does not constitute clinical advice. Treatment decisions should be informed by the best available published research, individualized assessment, and obtained with the informed consent of the client or their legal guardian. Behavior analysts are responsible for practicing within the boundaries of their competence and adhering to the BACB Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts.